Alabama Senate Bill SB250

Alabama 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/22
• Refer: 2/23/22

Caption

Drycleaning and Environmental Response Trust Fund Act, all owners, operators, and wholesale distributors required to participate in program, former owner or operator may pay annual fee to participate, Secs. 22-30D-3 to 22-30D-7, inclusive, 22-30D-9 to 22-30D-12, inclusive, am'd.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to enhance environmental protections by ensuring that all entities involved in drycleaning are financially responsible for managing contamination. This includes mandatory registration and the payment of fees that fund remediation efforts. Additionally, the law allows the establishment of a self-insurance model through which covered parties can access funds to address contamination without excessive out-of-pocket expenditures. As a result, it aims to alleviate the financial burden of contamination clean-up from taxpayers while holding industry players accountable.

Summary

SB250, known as the Drycleaning and Environmental Response Trust Fund Act, amends existing legislation to require participation from all owners, operators, and wholesale distributors of drycleaning facilities in a state-sponsored program aimed at investigating and remediating contamination caused by drycleaning agents. The amendments introduce provisions for former owners to participate by paying an annual fee, thereby broadening the scope of those liable for contamination. This bill signifies a proactive approach by the state to manage environmental impacts associated with the drycleaning industry.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB250 stem from concerns regarding the financial implications for small businesses within the drycleaning sector. Opponents argue that mandatory registration and associated fees could impose significant financial strains, especially on smaller operations that may struggle to bear the burden of environmental compliance costs. Supporters contend that the long-term benefits of the program, including the potential for improved public health and environmental safety, outweigh the initial costs. The ongoing debate will likely center on balancing effective environmental management with the financial realities faced by small business owners.