Crimes and offenses, assault against a first responder, created, riot and inciting to riot, further provided, aggravated riot, and unlawful traffic interference, created, holding period after arrest, provided, penalties for defunding police, provided, Secs. 13A-11-3.1, 13A-11-5.1 added; Secs. 13A-6-21, 13A-11-1, 13A-11-3, 13A-11-4, 15-10-3 am'd.
The legislation also modifies existing definitions of riot and inciting a riot, establishing a new crime of aggravated riot with increased penalties. Under the bill, unauthorized attempts to impede traffic are classified as unlawful traffic interference, with specific penalties prescribed for offenders. A mandatory period of incarceration is imposed for those charged with the new offenses, which seeks to ensure offenders face immediate consequences and reinforce law enforcement authority. Local law enforcement agencies must receive appropriate funding; if a jurisdiction disbands or defunds its law enforcement agency, it becomes ineligible for state financial assistance until the agency is restored, placing an emphasis on maintaining adequate police funding.
Senate Bill 3 (SB3) introduces significant changes to Alabama's criminal code concerning the assault of first responders and laws related to riots. The bill creates two degrees of assault against first responders, establishing that serious physical harm or use of weapons against them is a first-degree felony. It further highlights actions that constitute assault in both first and second degrees, reflecting a heightened legal protection for emergency personnel, including police, firefighters, and medical responders, during the execution of their duties.
While proponents argue that SB3 enhances public safety and protects those who protect the community, critics raise concerns about the implications of mandating incarceration and the potential for increased penalties to disproportionately affect marginalized groups. The bill's supporters emphasize that it addresses urgent issues surrounding public safety and the treatment of first responders, whereas opponents worry that it might undermine civil liberties and local governance rights.