Alabama House Bill HB435

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/4/23
• Refer: 5/4/23
• Report Pass: 5/17/23
• Engrossed: 5/24/23
• Refer: 5/24/23
• Report Pass: 6/1/23
• Enrolled: 6/6/23
• Passed: 6/6/23

Caption

Relating to elections; to amend Section 17-8-12, Code of Alabama 1975, to increase the supplemental compensation paid to election inspectors and clerks; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.

Impact

If enacted, HB 435 would have significant financial implications for local governments as it mandates new or increased expenditures in compliance with Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama. This could lead to local entities needing to allocate more funds specifically for election-related expenses. The bill's passage is contingent on a two-thirds vote unless local entities approve the additional costs or the state appropriates funds to cover them, indicating that local governments must be prepared for potential budgetary impacts that arise from the new compensation requirements.

Summary

House Bill 435 aims to amend Section 17-8-12 of the Code of Alabama 1975 to increase the supplemental compensation for election inspectors and clerks. The bill establishes a new minimum compensation rate for these officials, ensuring that election clerks receive at least $125 a day and inspectors receive at least $150 a day, in addition to any compensation they may receive from local laws. The legislation is intended to enhance the remuneration of election officials and ensure they are adequately compensated for their duties during elections, reinforcing the importance of their roles in the electoral process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 435 appears primarily supportive among legislators who recognize the need to properly compensate election officials for their essential services. The general consensus is that better compensation will not only incentivize participation in these roles but also improve the overall electoral process by ensuring that qualified individuals are serving as inspectors and clerks. However, concerns regarding the financial burden on local governments have been voiced, particularly among some local leaders who fear funding elections may strain already limited resources.

Contention

Though generally receiving bipartisan support, HB 435 has sparked some debate regarding its financial implications on local government budgets. Proponents argue that raising compensation reflects the value of the work done by election officials, especially in an election year, while opponents caution about the financial feasibility of implementing such compensation changes. There is also apprehension that without proper state funding, certain localities might struggle to comply with the new mandates, thereby impacting election administration at the local level.