Alabama House Bill HB539

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/25
• Refer: 4/8/25
• Report Pass: 4/9/25
• Refer: 4/10/25
• Report Pass: 4/17/25
• Enrolled: 5/15/25
• Passed: 5/22/25

Caption

Randolph County, judge of probate, county commission, additional special transaction fee imposed

Impact

The implementation of this bill will adjust the financial framework within which the Randolph County government operates by introducing a new revenue stream. This additional fee on map recording and copying aims to ensure that the county can adequately manage these tasks without it burdening the existing budget. It provides the county commission with the flexibility to allocate resources as necessary, potentially improving operational efficiency in the probate office.

Summary

House Bill 539 introduces an additional special transaction fee in Randolph County, specifically for the recording and copying of maps of plats by the judge of probate. This fee is set at fifty dollars ($50) per map, which will be collected by the probate judge and deposited into the County General Fund. The bill allows these funds to be utilized at the discretion of the county commission for expenses related to processing, digitizing, and laminating these documents. It aims to provide financial resources for the necessary administrative processes associated with map management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 539 appears to be neutral to positive, given its straightforward administrative focus. As the bill includes a specific fee allocated to improve county services, it does not seem to elicit significant opposition or contention. The clarity and designated use of the funds may contribute to support among stakeholders who favor enhanced functionality within local government operations.

Contention

While there is no notable contention highlighted concerning HB 539, it is essential to recognize that any new fees may face scrutiny from community members concerned about the financial implications for individuals needing to access these services. However, the bill's localized and administrative nature may mitigate broader disputes, making it more likely to pass without major challenges.