Arkansas House Bill HB1368

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/7/23
• Report Pass: 2/16/23
• Engrossed: 2/20/23
• Refer: 2/20/23
• Report Pass: 2/27/23
• Enrolled: 3/1/23
• Chaptered: 3/6/23
• Passed: 3/6/23

Caption

To Amend The Law Concerning Contracts For Work To Be Performed On State Aid Roads; And To Amend The Aggregate Cost Maximum For Contracts For Work To Be Performed On State Aid Roads.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 1368 are expected to significantly affect local governance and the management of state aid roads. By increasing the maximum contract amounts, counties will have the opportunity to engage more effectively with larger projects that require substantial funding. Furthermore, expanding the mileage for designation will facilitate the inclusion of additional roads that may not have had access to state resources previously. This could lead to improved connectivity and infrastructure throughout the state.

Summary

House Bill 1368 aims to amend existing laws related to contracts for work performed on state aid roads in Arkansas. The bill specifically increases the maximum aggregate cost for contracts related to these roads from $200,000 to $500,000, allowing counties greater financial flexibility when contracting for road work. Additionally, it seeks to expand the designation of the state aid road system from a total mileage of 15,000 to 20,000 miles, thereby enhancing the state's infrastructure capabilities and providing more areas with necessary road improvements.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 1368 appears to be largely positive among legislators, as evidenced by its unanimous passage in the voting session with 34 yeas and no nays. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step to modernize state aid road management and recognize the need for increased funding limits in a rapidly growing infrastructure landscape. Despite this positivity, there may be some underlying concerns regarding how this shift in funding strategy could impact local decision-making and budget considerations.

Contention

While HB 1368 has been well-received, there could be points of contention regarding the specific allocation of increased funding and the prioritization of road projects. Some critics might argue that concentration of funds into larger contracts could sideline smaller projects that are equally vital for local communities. Moreover, if the expansion of the aid road system leads to increased responsibilities without adequate resources, there could be challenges in managing these new contracts effectively.