Arkansas House Bill HB1381

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/15/23
• Engrossed: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 2/21/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Report Pass: 4/4/23
• Refer: 4/5/23
• Report Pass: 4/6/23
• Enrolled: 4/7/23
• Chaptered: 4/11/23
• Passed: 4/11/23

Caption

To Amend The Law Concerning Arkansas's Contribution To The National Statuary Hall Collection In The United States Capitol.

Impact

This bill represents a significant update to how Arkansas manages its contributions to the National Statuary Hall Collection. By enabling the donation of existing statues, the legislation could lead to a broader discussion about how state icons are recognized and memorialized. Furthermore, the introduction of replica statues aims to celebrate notable figures in Arkansas's history, potentially enhancing public engagement with the state’s cultural narrative. The placement of these replicas may also encourage tourism and interest in Arkansas's heritage.

Summary

House Bill 1381 aims to amend the Arkansas Code regarding the state's contribution to the National Statuary Hall Collection in the United States Capitol. The bill seeks to provide the Secretary of State with the authority to donate the existing statues of U.M. Rose and James P. Clarke from the National Statuary Hall Collection to any public entity, subject to the approval of the Legislative Council or the Joint Budget Committee during legislative sessions. Additionally, the bill allows for the placement of replica statues of Daisy Lee Gatson Bates and John R. 'Johnny' Cash on the State Capitol grounds, thereby promoting Arkansas's cultural heritage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1381 appears to be largely positive, as it accommodates the desire to celebrate and recognize prominent Arkansas figures through public art. Legislators expressed support for the initiative, viewing it as an opportunity to honor the state’s history and contributions to American culture. However, any potential contention has not been noted in the available discussions, suggesting broad consensus on the bill's intent.

Contention

While the bill seems to be well-received, the main point of contention could arise from the approval process for donations and placements of statues, which requires legislative oversight. This may lead to discussions about the criteria used for selecting which figures are honored with statues and which locations are deemed suitable for display. The implications of public entity involvement in receiving donated statues could also prompt debates regarding priorities in state-supported public art initiatives.