Arkansas Senate Bill SB251

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/23
• Refer: 2/13/23
• Report Pass: 2/28/23
• Engrossed: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/1/23
• Report Pass: 3/8/23
• Enrolled: 3/14/23
• Chaptered: 3/24/23
• Passed: 3/24/23

Caption

Concerning The Administrative Office Of The Keep Arkansas Beautiful Commission; And To Amend The Duties Of The State Parks Division.

Impact

The passage of SB251 would reorganize the administrative duties of the Keep Arkansas Beautiful Commission, allowing for enhanced alignment with state parks initiatives. This change is expected to foster improved communication and collaboration among departments, leading to more coherent environmental efforts. The integration within the State Parks Division could also open avenues for additional funding and resources aimed at the promotion of statewide beautification efforts and sustainability projects.

Summary

Senate Bill 251 is designed to enhance the administrative framework of the Keep Arkansas Beautiful Commission by relocating its office under the Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism's State Parks Division. This amendment aims to streamline operations and promote the conservation of Arkansas's natural environment more effectively. By instituting this new structure, the bill seeks to ensure that programs related to environmental awareness and beautification are more efficiently managed and executed within the existing state framework.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB251 appears to be positive, with significant support illustrated by its favorable voting history. The bill received overwhelming approval in the third reading, with only a few dissenting votes. Advocates for the bill, including environmental groups and state officials, stand to benefit from the administrative improvements as they could lead to a more impactful approach to public programs designed to raise awareness about environmental issues in Arkansas.

Contention

While there is broad support for SB251, some concerns may arise regarding the allocation of resources among state departments, as well as the actual implementation of the proposed changes. Critics might argue that integrating the commission too closely with state parks could dilute its focus on broader environmental issues beyond parks and tourism. However, these points of contention did not significantly hinder the bill's progression through the legislative process.