Arkansas Senate Bill SB432

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Report Pass: 3/29/23
• Engrossed: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Report Pass: 4/4/23
• Enrolled: 4/6/23
• Chaptered: 4/11/23
• Passed: 4/11/23

Caption

To Establish The Conditions Under Which A Public School That Operates Primarily As A Virtual School May Offer A Statewide Student Assessment In A Virtual Setting.

Impact

The implementation of SB432 would amend Arkansas Code to incorporate a dedicated section for virtual testing standards. This legislative change would allow virtual schools to conduct statewide assessments while maintaining certain requirements, such as ensuring student supervision during the assessment. Furthermore, it would establish protocols for assessment integrity, including necessary technological measures to monitor students actively during testing, thereby addressing concerns regarding exam security and fairness.

Summary

Senate Bill 432 aims to establish specific conditions under which public schools that operate primarily as virtual schools can administer statewide student assessments in a virtual environment. The bill seeks to facilitate the assessment process for virtual learners while ensuring that the educational needs of each student are met in the digital format. By providing a framework for virtual assessments, the bill aims to promote educational consistency and accountability within virtual schools, which has become increasingly relevant as digital learning continues to expand in popularity.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB432 appears to be generally positive among supporters who view it as a necessary adaptation to modern education trends. Proponents argue that it acknowledges the growing role of virtual schooling and provides a structured approach to statewide assessments that can accommodate this format. However, there may be some apprehensions from parents and educators regarding the effectiveness and accessibility of virtual assessments due to potential tech disparities among students, suggesting that while the bill is a step forward, its execution could reveal challenges.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB432 include concerns over the logistics of ensuring adequate monitoring of students during assessments, particularly in home settings. The requirement for two devices for testing—one for assessment and another for proctoring—has raised questions about its feasibility for all students. Moreover, discussions surrounding the adequacy of support and resources for students during these assessments may highlight disparities in equity and access, which could emerge as critical issues as the bill moves forward.