Arkansas Senate Bill SB586

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/6/23
• Refer: 4/6/23

Caption

To Amend The Law Concerning Inmates Of State Facilities; To Establish Parameters Regarding The Use Of Segregated Confinement; And To Establish Alternative Therapeutic And Rehabilitative Confinement Options.

Impact

If enacted, SB586 would significantly reform how segregated confinement is managed in state correctional facilities. The bill imposes limitations on the duration of segregated confinement, restricts its use to severe disciplinary violations, and mandates that inmates with serious mental illnesses must not be placed in such confinement. Additionally, it sets forth requirements for individual rehabilitation plans and eliminates the possibility of indefinite segregation without review, thereby enhancing the rights and treatment of inmates. This could lead to better mental health outcomes and reduce instances of punitive isolation in prisons.

Summary

Senate Bill 586 aims to amend regulations concerning inmates of state facilities by establishing parameters around segregated confinement and promoting alternative therapeutic and rehabilitative confinement options. The bill introduces a subchapter that defines terms like 'segregated confinement' and 'residential rehabilitation unit', while outlining the conditions under which these units can be used. It highlights the importance of therapy in correctional settings and emphasizes the need for trauma-informed care to address underlying psychological issues related to inmate behavior.

Contention

While proponents argue that SB586 will improve inmate rehabilitation and lead to a safer environment for both inmates and staff, opponents raise concerns regarding its implementation, especially in ensuring adequate mental health resources and appropriate training for staff dealing with rehabilitative processes. The bill does not specify funding allocations or additional resources necessary for training and therapy programs, raising questions about its practicality and effectiveness in reducing reliance on segregated confinement. Critics also worry that without proper oversight, the guidelines intended to protect inmates might not be properly enforced.