Arkansas Senate Bill SB87

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23
• Report Pass: 1/31/23
• Engrossed: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Report Pass: 2/8/23
• Enrolled: 2/14/23
• Chaptered: 2/23/23
• Passed: 2/23/23

Caption

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning The Creation And Implementation Of The Code Of Arkansas Rules.

Impact

The enactment of SB 87 would significantly update the existing procedures under the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act. By formalizing the process for public commentary and ensuring effective notification regarding the status of rules, the bill aims to promote a more transparent regulatory environment. The Bureau of Legislative Research would be tasked with establishing and maintaining an electronic filing system that facilitates easier public access to current and proposed administrative rules, potentially leading to greater engagement from citizens and stakeholders.

Summary

Senate Bill 87 aims to amend Arkansas law regarding the creation and implementation of the Code of Arkansas Rules. The bill stipulates the procedures for adopting rules by state agencies, particularly emphasizing the need for a thirty-day public comment period prior to rule finalization. This provision is intended to enhance transparency and allow public input on regulatory measures that may affect citizens. Furthermore, the bill introduces stipulations for final rule filings, urging agencies to inform relevant parties about new rules effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 87 appears to be largely positive among proponents who see it as a step towards modernizing Arkansas's administrative rulemaking framework. By ensuring that rules undergo public scrutiny before finalization, advocates argue that it empowers citizens and improves governance. However, there may be concerns regarding bureaucratic efficiency and the potential for delays due to the added requirement for public commentary, which could lead to debates about balancing timely governance with public involvement.

Contention

While the bill has generally received support, there may be points of contention regarding the implementation of the electronic filing system. Questions may arise about the adequacy of resources allocated to maintain the proposed online database and whether it will effectively serve the purpose of improving public access to rules. Additionally, navigating the public comment process could prove challenging for agencies that may be accustomed to swiftly implementing regulations without such oversight.