Arkansas Senate Bill SJR20

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Failed: 5/1/23

Caption

An Amendment To The Arkansas Constitution Concerning The Manner In Which Judicial Elections Are Conducted.

Impact

The passage of SJR20 would have significant implications for state laws governing judicial elections. By amending the Constitution, it may introduce new procedures or criteria that govern how judicial candidates can run for office or how elections are managed. Potential changes could focus on increasing transparency, voter engagement, or introducing new standards that seek to diminish the influence of partisan politics in the election of judges.

Summary

SJR20 is a proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that seeks to redefine the process of judicial elections within the state. This bill emphasizes the manner in which judges are elected, suggesting changes that could alter the existing electoral framework. The stated purpose is to enhance the integrity and effectiveness of judicial elections, ensuring that they reflect the will of the electorate more accurately. This resolution, if adopted, would necessitate a majority approval from voters in Arkansas in the next general election to be enacted into law.

Contention

Notable discussions surrounding SJR20 have highlighted concerns about the potential impacts such an amendment might have on the judicial independence and the electoral process itself. Supporters of the bill argue that reforming judicial elections is necessary to ensure fair and impartial judgments that align with the public interest. However, opponents may raise concerns regarding the likelihood of politicizing the judiciary further, as well as fears that such changes could skew the balance of power between branches of state governance.