Arkansas House Bill HB1428

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/25
• Refer: 2/6/25
• Report Pass: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/24/25
• Report Pass: 2/25/25
• Engrossed: 2/27/25
• Refer: 2/27/25
• Report Pass: 4/9/25
• Enrolled: 4/14/25
• Enrolled: 4/15/25
• Chaptered: 4/17/25
• Passed: 4/17/25

Caption

To Amend The Law Regarding Public Lodging; And To Provide A Bed Height Requirement For Mobility Accessible Rooms.

Impact

The introduction of this bill is expected to have significant implications for lodging regulations in the state. For new establishments, compliance with the set bed height will be mandatory from day one of operation. Meanwhile, existing establishments will only be required to comply with these standards when their mobility accessible rooms are upgraded or when the room reaches the end of its life cycle. This phased approach aims to balance the needs for accessibility with the practical realities of business operations.

Summary

House Bill 1428 aims to amend existing laws regarding public lodging in Arkansas by establishing specific bed height requirements for mobility accessible rooms. The bill mandates that beds in new lodging establishments must not exceed twenty-three inches in height from the floor to the top of the mattress. This requirement is aimed at improving accessibility for individuals with mobility impairments, ensuring that they have suitable accommodations when staying at hotels and similar facilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1428 appears to be generally positive among advocates for disability rights and accessibility. Supporters of the bill view it as a necessary step toward ensuring equitable access to lodging facilities for individuals with mobility challenges. On the other hand, some concerns have been raised about the feasibility of such regulations for existing establishments, particularly regarding potential financial implications for businesses required to retroactively comply with the new standards.

Contention

There is notable contention surrounding how the bill will affect small businesses versus larger chains. While proponents argue that these standards will lead to better accommodations and promote inclusivity, opponents suggest that the financial burden of retrofitting existing facilities could disproportionately impact smaller lodging providers. The debate emphasizes the need to balance improved access with economic considerations for local businesses in the hospitality sector.