Arkansas 2025 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1572 Draft / Bill

Filed 02/25/2025

                    Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 
*ANS110* 	02/25/2025 7:57:21 AM ANS110 
State of Arkansas     1 
95th General Assembly A Bill     2 
Regular Session, 2025  	HOUSE BILL 1572 3 
 4 
By: Representatives Ladyman, Unger, Beck, S. Meeks 5 
By: Senators M. McKee, C. Penzo, Gilmore 6 
 7 
For An Act To Be Entitled 8 
AN ACT TO CREATE A TECHNICAL AND LEGAL FEASIBILITY 9 
STUDY ON NEW NUCLEAR ENERGY GENERATION; TO DECLARE AN 10 
EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 11 
 12 
 13 
Subtitle 14 
TO CREATE A TECHNICAL AND LEGAL 15 
FEASIBILITY STUDY ON NEW NUCLEAR ENERGY 16 
GENERATION; AND TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY. 17 
 18 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: 19 
 20 
 SECTION 1.  DO NOT CODIFY.  TEMPORARY LANGUAGE. 21 
 (a)  Within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this act, the 22 
Arkansas Public Service Commission shall engage an outside consulting firm to 23 
conduct a technical and legal feasibility study on promoting nuclear energy 24 
generation in this state. 25 
 (b)  The consulting firm hired under subsection (a) of this section 26 
shall: 27 
 (1)  Be well-established in the nuclear industry; 28 
 (2)  Have a large majority of United States nuclear operators as 29 
its customers; 30 
 (3)  Have had nuclear licensing as its primary business for a 31 
substantial length of time; 32 
 (4)  Be staffed with nuclear energy and nuclear law experts; and 33 
 (5)  Be neutral with regard to reactor technology and designs. 34 
 (c)  Preference shall be given to a consulting firm that is managed by 35 
and owned in substantial part by military veterans with nuclear operating 36    	HB1572 
 
 	2 	02/25/2025 7:57:21 AM ANS110 
experience from the military veterans' time in military service. 1 
 (d)  The feasibility study shall consider: 2 
 (1)  The advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy 3 
generation in this state, including without limitation the economic and 4 
environmental impact; 5 
 (2)  Ways to maximize the use of workers who reside in this state 6 
and products made in this state in the construction of nuclear energy 7 
generation facilities; 8 
 (3)  Evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations on: 9 
 (A)  Design characteristics and evaluation, including 10 
specific recommendations of optimal designs based on site characteristics and 11 
possible industrial uses; 12 
 (B)  Environmental and ecological impacts; 13 
 (C)  Land and siting criteria, including specific areas 14 
that are best suited for new nuclear generation based on the land and siting 15 
criteria; 16 
 (D)  Safety criteria; 17 
 (E)  Engineering and cost -related criteria; and 18 
 (F)  Small modular nuclear reactor and microreactor 19 
capability; 20 
 (4)  Socioeconomic assessment and impact analysis, including 21 
without limitation consideration of the impact on: 22 
 (A)  Workforce education, training, and development; 23 
 (B)  Local and state tax base; 24 
 (C)  Supply chains; and 25 
 (D)  Permanent and temporary job creation; 26 
 (5)  The timeline for development, including areas of potential 27 
acceleration or efficiencies and leveraging existing facilities within this 28 
state; 29 
 (6)  Additional efficiencies and other benefits that may be 30 
gained by coordinating with other advanced, clean energy technologies, 31 
including without limitation hydrogen, direct air capture of carbon dioxide, 32 
and energy storage; 33 
 (7)  Literature review of studies that have assessed the 34 
potential impact of nuclear energy generation in supporting an energy 35 
transition; 36    	HB1572 
 
 	3 	02/25/2025 7:57:21 AM ANS110 
 (8)  Analysis of national and international studies of cases 1 
where development of nuclear energy is supported and adopted; and 2 
 (9)  Assessment and recommendation of current and future policies 3 
that may be needed to support or accelerate the adoption of nuclear energy 4 
generation or may improve its cost -effectiveness, including a survey of 5 
federal programs and other methods that could financially assist a nuclear 6 
project in this state. 7 
 (e)  The commission, electric cooperatives, and municipally owned 8 
utilities shall cooperate in providing information relevant to the 9 
feasibility study as needed, subject to notifications to stakeholders and 10 
reasonable safeguards to protect confidential information from being made 11 
public. 12 
 (f)  No later than fifteen (15) months after the effective date of this 13 
act, the commission shall deliver a written report on the feasibility study 14 
to the: 15 
 (1)  Governor; 16 
 (2)  President Pro Tempore of the Senate; 17 
 (3)  Senate majority leader; 18 
 (4)  Senate minority leader; 19 
 (5)  Speaker of the House of Representatives; 20 
 (6)  Majority leader of the House of Representatives; 21 
 (7)  Minority leader of the House of Representatives; and 22 
 (8)  Chairpersons of the Joint Committee on Energy. 23 
 24 
 SECTION 2.  EMERGENCY CLAUSE.  It is found and determined by the 25 
General Assembly of the State of Arkansas that this act is immediately 26 
necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, or safety. 27 
Therefore, an emergency is declared to exist, and this act being immediately 28 
necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety shall 29 
become effective on: 30 
 (1)  The date of its approval by the Governor; 31 
 (2)  If the bill is neither approved nor vetoed by the Governor, 32 
the expiration of the period of time during which the Governor may veto the 33 
bill; or 34 
 (3)  If the bill is vetoed by the Governor and the veto is 35 
overridden, the date the last house overrides the veto. 36