Arkansas Senate Bill SB324

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Report Pass: 3/4/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 3/19/25
• Enrolled: 4/4/25
• Chaptered: 4/10/25
• Passed: 4/10/25

Caption

To Amend The Law Concerning The Membership Of A County Planning Board.

Impact

The proposed amendments have implications for local governance by potentially reshaping how community planning boards operate. With a requirement for a minimum number of members to reside in unincorporated areas of the county, the bill intends to enhance the representation of rural voices in planning processes. This could lead to more localized and tailored planning initiatives that address the unique needs of various county regions. The provision also supports the idea of involving community members who are not entangled in other political commitments, possibly fostering more independent decision-making.

Summary

Senate Bill 324 aims to amend existing laws regarding the membership structure of county planning boards in the state of Arkansas. The bill proposes that a county judge may create a planning board with a membership ranging from a minimum of five to a maximum of twelve members. Importantly, the bill states that at least one-third of the appointed members cannot hold any other elective office or appointment, with the exception of certain specified positions. This aims to ensure that the planning board has a diverse perspective and is not overshadowed by individuals with existing political responsibilities.

Contention

Notably, the bill may face contention regarding the limitations on membership and the structure of planning boards. Critics could argue that excluding individuals with other elective offices might negate valuable insights that such members may bring, particularly regarding broader regional planning strategies. The requirement that two-thirds of the board reside in unincorporated areas may also raise concerns about urban representation and the balance between urban and rural needs within the county's development agenda. Stakeholders will need to consider these points during discussions and potential revisions of the bill.