Arizona 2022 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2033 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/22/2022

                    ARIZONA STATE SENATE 
RESEARCH STAFF 
 
 
TO: MEMBERS OF THE SENATE 
 JUDICIARY COMMITTEE 
DATE: March 22, 2022 
SUBJECT: Strike everything amendment to H.B. 2033, relating to prohibitions; digital 
application distribution platforms
 
Purpose 
 Prohibits a provider of a digital application distribution platform from requiring the 
exclusive use of an in-application payment system to download a software application or purchase 
a digital or physical product or service through a software application. 
Background 
 The Office of the Attorney General (AG) serves as the chief legal officer of Arizona and 
receives complaints and investigates alleged violations relating to civil rights, consumer fraud and 
other statutes as authorized (A.R.S. Title 41, Chapter 1, Article 5). The Office of the AG consists 
of the Criminal Division, State Government Division, Child and Family Protection Division, Civil 
Litigation Division, Appeals and Constitutional Litigation Division, Communications Division 
and Operations Division (AG). 
 There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this 
legislation. 
Provisions 
1. Prohibits a provider of a digital application distribution platform for which cumulative 
software application downloads from the platform exceed 1,000,000 downloads in the previous 
or current calendar year from: 
a) requiring a developer that is domiciled in Arizona to use in-application payment systems 
that are owned or controlled by the digital application distribution platform as the exclusive 
mode of accepting payments from a user to download a software application or purchase a 
digital or physical product or service through a software application; 
b) requiring exclusive use of in-application payment systems that are owned or controlled by 
the digital application distribution platform for accepting payments from Arizona users to 
download a software application or purchase a digital or physical product or service 
through a software application; or 
c) retaliating against a developer that is domiciled in Arizona for offering or accepting 
payments with, or against an Arizona user for using, an in-application system that is not 
owned by, operated by or affiliated with the provider. 
2. Includes, among prohibited retaliatory acts, demoting the search rankings of the developer, 
shifting fees toward the developer or slowing down the application review and approval 
timelines.  
 
 
ZACK DEAN 
LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH ANALYST 
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE 
Telephone: (602) 926-3171  STRIKER MEMO 
H.B. 2033 
Page 2 
 
 
3. Excludes, from the prohibitions, special-purpose digital application distribution platforms, 
which are platforms established primarily for: 
a) use by public safety agencies; or 
b) single or specialized categories of applications, software and services provided to users on 
hardware intended primarily for specific purposes, including gaming consoles, music 
players and other special-purpose devices connected to the internet. 
4. Allows the AG to receive complaints, investigate violations and bring an action in any court 
of competent jurisdiction to obtain legal or equitable relief on behalf of a person aggrieved by 
a violation. 
5. Allows any person aggrieved by a violation to commence a civil action on the person's own 
behalf in any court of competent jurisdiction to obtain legal or equitable relief, including 
reasonable attorney fees and costs. 
6. Prohibits a civil action from being commenced until 60 days after the plaintiff has notified the 
AG, or if the AG is diligently prosecuting an action in court arising from the same alleged 
violation. 
7. Defines Arizona user as a user whose most recent address shown in the records of a provider 
is located within Arizona and continues to be an Arizona user even when temporarily absent 
from Arizona. 
8. Defines developer as a creator of software applications that are made available for download 
by users through a digital application distribution platform or other digital distribution 
platform. 
9. Defines digital application distribution platform as: 
a) a digital distribution platform for applications and services that are provided to users on 
mobile phones, smartphones or other mobile computing services and the devices run a 
mobile operating system that is owned or controlled by the provider of the digital 
distribution platform; and 
b) includes a digital distribution platform that is provided or used for only certain types of 
devices, such as certain grades or computing devices that are made by only a particular 
manufacturer. 
10. Defines domiciled in Arizona as a person that conducts in Arizona the substantial portion of 
work to create or to maintain digital applications. 
11. Defines in-application payment systems as an application, service or user interface that is used 
to process payments from users to developers for software applications and digital and physical 
products and services distributed through software applications. 
12. Defines provider as a person that owns, operates implements or maintains a digital application 
distribution platform or an in-application payment system. 
13. Becomes effective on the general effective date.