Arizona 2022 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2722 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/08/2022

                    Assigned to JUD 	FOR COMMITTEE 
 
 
 
 
ARIZONA STATE SENATE 
Fifty-Fifth Legislature, Second Regular Session 
 
FACT SHEET FOR H.B. 2722 
 
strategic actions; public participation 
Purpose 
Expands the applicability of motions to dismiss strategic actions against public 
participation and allows a court to quash, rather than only dismiss, a strategic action against public 
participation. 
Background 
A defending party may file a motion to dismiss a legal action involving a party's exercise 
of the right to petition. The court must grant the motion unless the non-moving party can show that 
the moving party's exercise of the right to petition did not contain any reasonable factual support 
or arguable basis in law, and that the moving party's acts caused actual compensable injury to the 
responding party. At the request of the moving party, the court must determine whether the lawsuit 
was brought to deter or prevent the moving party from exercising constitutional rights, and thereby 
brought for an improper purpose, such as causing unnecessary delay or needless increase in the 
cost of litigation. The moving party must be awarded reasonable attorney fees if the motion to 
dismiss is granted.  
Statute governing the ability of a party to file a motion to dismiss an action brought in this 
manner does not: 1) affect, limit or preclude the right of the moving party to any remedy otherwise 
authorized by law; 2) apply to an enforcement action that is brought in the name of this state or a 
political subdivision of this state; 3) create any privileges or immunities or otherwise affect, limit 
or preclude any privileges or immunities authorized by law; or 4) limit or preclude a legislative or 
executive body or a public agency from enforcing the rules of procedure and rules of order of the 
body or agency (A.R.S. § 12-752). 
Exercise of the right to petition means any written or oral statement that falls within the 
constitutional protection of free speech and that is made as part of an initiative, referendum or 
recall effort or that is all of the following: 1) made before or submitted to a legislative or executive 
body or any other governmental proceeding; 2) made in connection with an issue that is under 
consideration or review by a legislative or executive body or any other governmental proceeding; 
and 3) made for the purpose of influencing a governmental action, decision or result (A.R.S.  
§ 12-751). 
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this 
legislation. 
Provisions 
1. Repeals statute defining exercise of the right to petition, governmental proceeding and legal 
action.  FACT SHEET 
H.B. 2722 
Page 2 
 
 
2. Allows a person to file a motion to dismiss or quash, rather than only dismiss, an action that 
involves, in addition to the person's right to petition, the person's constitutional right of speech, 
right to freely associate or right to peaceably assemble. 
3. Requires the court to grant the motion to dismiss or quash unless: 
a) if the responding party is a state actor, the responding party shows that the legal action in 
question is supported by clearly established law and that the trier of fact, on undisputed 
material facts, could not reasonably find that the responding party acted in order to deter, 
prevent or retaliate against the moving party's exercise of constitutional rights; or 
b) if the responding party is not a state actor, the responding party shows that the legal action 
in question is justified by existing law or by reasonable argument for extending or 
modifying existing law. 
4. Removes the existing exception to a court being required to grant a motion to dismiss based 
on a finding that the moving party's exercise of the right to petition did not contain any 
reasonable factual support or any arguable basis in law.  
5. Removes the requirement that the court, at the request of the moving party, determine whether 
an action was brought to deter or prevent the moving party from exercising constitutional rights 
and is thereby brought for an improper purpose. 
6. Stipulates that a moving party is encouraged to pursue additional damages, in addition to 
additional sanctions, if a court finds that an action was brought to deter, prevent or retaliate 
against the exercise of constitutional rights or is otherwise brought for an improper purpose. 
7. Reduces, from 90 days to 60 days, the time period within which a motion to dismiss or quash 
may be filed after the service of the complaint or other document on which the motion is based. 
8. Removes the requirement that the court, when possible, give calendar preference to strategic 
actions and conduct an expedited hearing after a motion to dismiss has been filed.  
9. Requires the court to schedule a hearing on a motion to dismiss or quash within 30 days after 
service of the motion, unless docket conditions require a later hearing or a court rule 
specifically provides otherwise. 
10. Requires all discovery proceedings in an action to be stayed on the filing of a notice of motion 
to dismiss or quash, unless a court rule specifically provides otherwise. 
11. Requires the stay of discovery to remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on 
the motion. 
12. Allows the court to order that specified discovery be conducted on noticed motion and for good 
cause shown. 
13. States that, if the court denies a motion to dismiss or quash, the denial and the court's supporting 
findings are not admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case or in any subsequent 
action.  FACT SHEET 
H.B. 2722 
Page 3 
 
 
14. States that the burden of proof or degree of proof that is otherwise applicable is not affected 
by the findings in any later stage of the case or in any subsequent proceeding. 
15. States that an order granting or denying a motion to dismiss or quash is appealable. 
16. Requires the court of appeals to expedite any appeal unless the court, for good cause shown, 
finds that expedited review is not feasible under the circumstances, or a court rule specifically 
provides otherwise. 
17. Expands the applicability of statute relating to strategic actions against public participation to 
enforcement actions brought by the state or its political subdivisions. 
18. Removes language stating that statute relating to strategic actions against public participation 
does not create any privileges or immunities or otherwise affect, limit or preclude any 
privileges or immunities authorized by law. 
19. Defines legal action as: 
a) any civil action, claim, cross-claim or counterclaim for damages other than nominal 
damages; 
b) any criminal prosecution; and 
c) any written investigative demand of a public meeting or proceeding or other compulsory 
legal process or any regulatory or administrative action by a state actor. 
20. States that a legal action does not include a motion to dismiss or quash a strategic action against 
public participation. 
21. Defines state actor as: 
a) the state and any of its political subdivisions; 
b) any branch, department, board, bureau, commission, council or committee of an entity of 
the state or its political subdivisions; and 
c) any officer, employee or other agent of the state or its political subdivisions who is acting 
in the officer's, employee's or agent's official capacity. 
22. Contains a severability clause. 
23. Makes technical and conforming changes. 
24. Becomes effective on the general effective date. 
House Action 
JUD 2/16/22 DPA 5-3-0-2 
3
rd
 Read 2/22/22  40-19-1  
Prepared by Senate Research 
March 8, 2022 
ZD/sr