Assigned to JUD FOR COMMITTEE
ARIZONA STATE SENATE
Fifty-Fifth Legislature, Second Regular Session
FACT SHEET FOR S.B. 1092
product liability; civil action; limitation
Purpose
Specifies reasons for which a product liability action may be commenced or maintained
against a product seller that is not also the manufacturer of the product at issue.
Background
Current statute requires a product manufacturer who refuses to accept a tender of defense
from a product seller to indemnify the seller for any judgement against the seller and reimburse
any attorney's fees and costs, unless: 1) the seller had knowledge of the product defect; or 2) an
alteration, modification or installation performed by the seller was a substantial cause of the
incident giving rise to the action, and the alteration, modification or installation was not authorized
by the manufacturer and not performed in compliance with manufacturer specifications.
If a judgement is rendered in favor of a plaintiff and the seller has been indemnified against
a manufacturer, the plaintiff is required to attempt to satisfy the judgement by levying execution
on the manufacturer and by making demand on any liability insurance carrier before attempting to
collect judgement from the seller.
If a seller provided plans for the manufacture of a product, the product was manufactured
according to the plans and the plans were a substantial cause of the product's alleged defect, the
manufacturer of the product shall be indemnified by the seller. In this case a plaintiff that is
rendered a favorable judgement is required to attempt to satisfy the judgement by levying
execution on the seller rather than the manufacturer (A.R.S. ยง 12-684).
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this
legislation.
Provisions
1. Specifies that indemnification and reimbursement requirements for manufacturers apply in any
product liability action that is commenced or maintained against a seller that is not also a
manufacturer of the product at issue unless certain exceptions apply.
2. Allows a product liability action to be commenced or maintained against a seller that is not
also a manufacturer of the product at issue if the seller:
a) provided the plans or specifications for the manufacture or preparation of the product, the
product was manufactured in compliance with the seller's plans and the plans were a
substantial cause of the product's alleged defect;
b) resold the product after first sale for use and the product was not in substantially the same
condition as it was when it left the manufacturer's possession, the change in condition was
known to the seller and was a substantial cause of the incident giving rise to the action; FACT SHEET
S.B. 1092
Page 2
c) failed to exercise reasonable care in assembling, maintaining or repairing the product at
issue, or in conveying the manufacturer's labels, warnings or instructions to the user, and
the failure was a substantial cause of the incident giving rise to the action; or
d) made an express warranty regarding the product independent of any express warranty made
by a manufacturer, the product failed to conform to the seller's independent express
warranty and the failure was a substantial cause of the incident giving rise to the action.
3. Specifies that a product liability action may be commenced or maintained against a seller that
is not also a manufacturer if the seller had actual knowledge of the defect in the product.
4. Makes technical and conforming changes.
5. Becomes effective on the general effective date.
Prepared by Senate Research
January 18, 2022
ZD/sr