Arizona 2022 2022 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1210 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 02/18/2022

                    Assigned to HHS 	AS PASSED BY COMMITTEE 
 
 
 
 
ARIZONA STATE SENATE 
Fifty-Fifth Legislature, Second Regular Session 
 
AMENDED 
FACT SHEET FOR S.B. 1210 
 
mentally ill; transportation; evaluation; treatment 
Purpose 
Allows the court, an admitting officer or evaluation agency to authorize apprehension and 
transportation of a proposed patient to an evaluation agency by an authorized transporter. 
Establishes the Study Committee on Alternative Behavioral Health Transportation (Committee) 
and outlines Committee membership, duties and requirements. 
Background 
Current statute authorizes any individual to apply for a court-ordered evaluation of a person 
alleged to be, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self or others or a person with a persistent, 
acute or grave disability that is unwilling or able to under a voluntary evaluation (A.R.S.  
§ 36-520). The petition for evaluation must include: 1) the name and address of the petitioner and 
the proposed patient; 2) the present whereabouts of the proposed patient; 3) a statement alleging 
there is reasonable cause to believe the proposed patient has a mental disorder, is a danger to self 
or others, has a persistent, acute or grave disability and is unwilling to or unable to undergo 
voluntary evaluation; 4) a summary of facts that support the allegations, including the facts that 
brought the proposed patient to the screening agency's attention; 5) any known criminal history of 
the proposed patient, if the petition is filed by a prosecutor, including whether the patient has even 
been found incompetent to stand trial; and 6) other information that the Director of the Department 
of Health Services (DHS) or the court may require (A.R.S. § 36-523)  
If the admitting officer of an evaluation agency has reasonable cause to believe that an 
emergency examination of a proposed patient is necessary, based on a review of the conversation 
with the applicant and peace officer, the admitting officer may advise the peace officer that 
sufficient ground exists to take the person into custody and transport the person to the evaluation 
agency. The peace officer, on advice of the admitting officer, must apprehend and transport the 
person to the evaluation agency (A.R.S. §§ 36-524 and 36-525).  
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this 
legislation. 
Provisions 
Court-Ordered Evaluation 
1. Allows the court, an admitting officer or evaluation agency to authorize apprehension and 
transportation of a proposed patient by an authorized transporter if the entity has authorized 
apprehension and transportation of the patient by a peace officer.  FACT SHEET – Amended  
S.B. 1210 
Page 2 
 
 
2. Specifies the following individuals or entities are not civilly liable for the apprehension and 
transportation of a proposed patient, except under acts of gross negligence: 
a) a person who provides a court, admitting officer or an evaluation agency with facts and 
circumstances or expressed an opinion that a proposed patient may be safely apprehended 
and transported to an evaluation agency by an authorized transporter without peace officer 
assistance; 
b) the court; 
c) the evaluation agency; 
d) an admitting officer of the evaluation agency; and 
e) the authorized transporter. 
3. States that evaluation agencies are not financially responsible for the use of an authorized 
transporter or for serving notices of hearing, copies of a petition or affidavits in support of the 
petition. 
4. Requires an evaluation petition to include a statement of any facts and circumstances that lead 
the petitioner to believe that the proposed patient may be safely transported to the evaluation 
agency by an authorized transporter without peace officer assistance. 
5. Requires any order and petition for court-ordered evaluation to be served on the proposed 
patient as directed by the court or court rule. 
6. Directs the peace officer or other authorized person required to serve the notice hearing to file 
a proof of service with the court specifying the date, time and manner of service. 
7. Stipulates that a petition for court-ordered treatment must contain a statement of any facts and 
circumstances that led the petitioner to believe the proposed patient may be safely transported 
to an evaluation agency by an authorized transporter without the assistance of a peace officer, 
if the patient is not detained in an evaluation agency at the time the order is filed.  
8. Requires the person who serves the hearing notice, the copy of the petition and the affidavits 
in support of the petition to be either a peace officer or another person authorized by the 
Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. 
9. Defines authorized transporter as a transportation entity that is contracted with a jurisdiction 
to pay for the provision of transportation of proposed patients to an evaluation agency and is 
either: 
a) an ambulance company that holds a valid certificate of necessity; or 
b) a transportation provider authorized by the state to provide safe behavioral health 
transportation. 
Study Committee on Alternative Behavioral Health Transportation 
10. Establishes the Committee, consisting of the following members: 
a) two members of the Senate from different political parties, with one member to serve as 
Co-Chair, appointed by the President of the Senate; 
b) two members of the House of Representatives from different political parties, with one 
member to serve as Co-Chair, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives; 
c) the DHS Director or the Director's designee;  FACT SHEET – Amended  
S.B. 1210 
Page 3 
 
 
d) the Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System or the Director's 
designee; 
e) a representative of a law enforcement agency from a county with a population of fewer 
than 1,000,000 persons, appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives; 
f) a representative of a law enforcement agency from a county with a population of 1,000,000 
persons or greater, appointed by the President of the Senate; 
g) a representative of an evaluation agency, appointed by the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives; 
h) two representatives of behavioral health advocacy organizations, one of whom is appointed 
by the President of the Senate and the other by the Speaker of the House of Representatives; 
i) a representative of a regional behavioral health authority, appointed by the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives; and 
j) a psychiatrist that is employed by a special health care district, appointed by the President 
of the Senate. 
11. Requires the Committee to research and make recommendations for the implementation and 
use of alternative behavioral health transportation providers for individuals involved in  
court-ordered evaluation or treatment as an alternative to transportation by peace officers, 
including: 
a) establishing criteria for the certification of behavioral health transportation providers, 
including the development of a training curriculum required to achieve the certification; 
b) recommending the appropriate agency for providing certification; 
c) identifying barriers to the use of alternative behavioral health transportation; and 
d) detailing the costs associated with the implementation of alternative transportation 
providers, including cost savings and benefits. 
12. Permits the Committee to hold hearings, conduct fact-finding tours and take testimony from 
witnesses, including participants in the behavioral health and law enforcement systems who 
may assist the Committee in fulfilling responsibilities. 
13. Requires the Legislature to provide staff and support services to the Committee. 
14. Requires the Committee, by December 31, 2023, to submit a report of its findings and 
recommendations to the Governor, President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Secretary of State. 
15. Repeals the Committee on July 1, 2024. 
Miscellaneous 
16. Makes technical and conforming changes. 
17. Becomes effective on the general effective date.  
Amendments Adopted by Committee 
1. States that evaluation agencies are not financially responsible for the use of an authorized 
transporter or for serving notices of hearing, copies of a petition or affidavits in support of the 
petition.  FACT SHEET – Amended  
S.B. 1210 
Page 4 
 
 
2. Requires an authorized transporter to pay the costs of transporting a proposed patient. 
3. Requires any order and petition for court-ordered evaluation to be served on the proposed 
patient as directed by the court or court rule. 
4. Requires persons that serve orders of treatment and petitions to be a peace officer or another 
person authorized by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. 
Senate Action 
HHS 2/16/22 DPA 6-2-0 
Prepared by Senate Research 
February 18, 2022 
MM/sr/slp