Arizona 2023 2023 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2307 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/16/2023

                    Fiscal Note 
 
 
BILL # HB 2307 	TITLE:  elections; hand counting; machines; prohibition 
SPONSOR: McGarr 	STATUS: As Introduced 
PREPARED BY: Micaela Larkin  
 
 
Description 
 
The bill would require that all votes be tabulated by hand in city, town, and county elections. Prohibits a city, town, or 
county from using a tabulating machine to count votes. 
 
Estimated Impact 
 
Overall, we estimate that the bill would increase counties' and cities' election expenses due to the change from 
automated tabulation to hand counting of ballots.  Given the state's standard practice of automated tabulation, we lack 
sufficient data on hand counting practices (such as counting time per ballot) to develop a reliable estimate.  
 
In addition, the bill as introduced contemplates conforming legislation to implement the new election requirements. Any 
subsequent legislation that enacts implementing details could significantly change the bill's fiscal impact.  
 
The bill's cost is dependent on the number of races to be counted under the description of "city, town, and county 
election". This estimate assumes that automated tabulation would continue to be used for federal, state, school district 
and special district elections, along with for all judicial candidate/retention elections, and state ballot measures. Our 
analysis assumes that hand counting would be used in elections for county and city offices and county/city ballot 
measures.   
 
As a caveat, we do not believe that the cost impacts described below can provide a holistic presentation of the fiscal 
impact, given that certain variables (as described below) could not be estimated with a reasonable amount of confidence.  
 
Most of the bill's fiscal impact would occur at the local level, since most election costs are paid by the city or county 
governments. While the Arizona Association of Counties (AACo) has not attempted to quantify the aggregate cost impact 
of the legislation, the organization has suggested the bill's impact would depend on the types of elections covered and the 
processes for conducting the hand count. 
 
We have asked the Secretary of State's Office for an estimate of any costs to their agency for this bill.  As of publication, 
we have not received a response. 
 
Analysis 
 
Given the uncertainty surrounding the bill's fiscal impact, our analysis below attempts to quantify the potential impact for 
one single General Election in Maricopa County. This, however, is an incomplete measure of the bill's total fiscal impact as 
costs would also be incurred in other counties and also for additional elections (primary elections, and other specific 
instances like city runoff elections or recounts). 
 
 
(Continued) 
  - 2 - 
 
 
Local Government Election Hand Counting Costs 
Depending on the year, General Election ballots in Maricopa County typically have a total of 70 to 80 ballot selections 
(candidates, judicial retention questions, and ballot measures). Based on a review of these items, in a typical 
"presidential" General Election year (where countywide officials are elected), we assume the bill's hand count 
requirement would apply to 10 selections for the average voter – this is based on the following selections for the voter: 1 
county supervisor, 6 countywide officials (sheriff, recorder, treasurer, assessor, attorney, school superintendent), 1 city 
mayor, 1 city council member, and 1 other measure (a city or county ballot measure).  
 
This analysis assumes the following issues are excluded from the hand count requirements: candidates for federal, state, 
school district and special district offices, any judicial candidate/retention elections, and any statewide ballot measures. 
Based on this data about the number of ballot items, the parameters below are a speculative estimate of the bill's cost for 
Maricopa County for one single General Election. 
 
Assuming 10 selections per ballot require a hand count, if each selection takes 15 seconds to review voter intent and 
record the vote, this would take 2.5 minutes per ballot [10 selections X 15 seconds each ÷ 60 seconds per minute]. The 
official canvass of the 2020 General Election (where countywide officials were elected) indicates there were 2,089,563 
ballots cast in Maricopa County. Using this ballot total multiplied by 2.5 minutes per ballot, that would suggest the 
resulting process would use approximately 87,065 hours of labor [2.09 million ballots X 2.5 minutes per ballot ÷ 60 
minutes per hour]. Using this assumption of 87,065 labor hours X a $25 hourly wage assumption, the manual hand 
counting of city/county races during a presidential year General Election in Maricopa County would cost approximately 
$2.2 million. 
 
This analysis does not assess the feasibility of finding enough staff/volunteers to generate 87,065 hours of labor during 
the ballot counting time period required by election deadlines. Our analysis also does not contemplate the cost of 
compiling the individual employee's hand count results and producing them as reportable totals, as we lack sufficient 
information on the potential process and any potential error rates in the hand counting process. 
 
Other Potential Fiscal Impacts 
As noted above, this analysis assumes the bill's hand counting provisions do not apply to federal, state, school district and 
special district offices, any judicial candidate/retention elections, and any statewide ballot measures. Instead, those 
elections would be counted using standard automated tabulation methods. Therefore, we estimate the bill's hand 
counting provisions will not produce any information technology savings – instead, the automatic methods will continue 
to be used for every single ballot, except with programming changes to only count the races eligible for automatic 
tabulation. 
 
2/16/23