Arizona 2023 2023 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2382 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 02/11/2023

                      	HB 2382 
Initials PRB 	Page 1 	Commerce 
 
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Fifty-sixth Legislature 
First Regular Session 
 
 
HB 2382: technical correction; chiropractic 
S/E: administrative decision; appeal; court costs 
Sponsor: Representative Gress, LD 4 
Committee on Commerce 
 
Summary of the Strike-Everything Amendment to HB 2382 
Overview 
Requires a regulated party, who appeals a decision and is affirmed by the court, to pay the 
prevailing party's court costs and fees. 
History 
Title 41, Chapter 6, Article 10, A.R.S., outlines administrative hearing procedures. Generally, the 
first appeal is an internal review within the agency. The next step is usually through the Office of 
Administrative Hearings (OAH). A person may file a notice of appeal or request a hearing with an 
agency on an appealable agency action or contested case. The agency submits a request for a 
hearing with Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH), which is then scheduled, assigned an 
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and noticed with affected parties. The OAH conducts a hearing 
and the ALJ issues a decision. The agency may accept, reject or modify the decision. The agency 
decision is considered the final decision unless: 1) the agency fails to timely accept, reject or 
modify the ALJ's decision, in which case the OAH certifies the ALJ's decision as the final 
administrative decision; 2) the agency's decision is subject to review by a governor-appointed 
board or commission who makes a final administrative decision; or 3) the licensee, in cases 
involving licensing decisions, accepts the ALJ's decision as the final administrative decision. A 
party may file a petition to appeal the final administrative decision with the superior court. 
In an action to review a final administrative decision, the court holds an evidentiary hearing to the 
extent necessary to determine whether to affirm, reverse, modify or vacate and remand the 
agency action. For review of a final administrative decision of an agency that regulates certain 
professions or occupations, the trial, if demanded in the notice of appeal or motion of an appellee 
other than the agency, is a trial de novo. A trial de novo is a new trial on an entire case, where 
both questions of fact and issues of law are determined as if there had been no previous trial 
(A.R.S. § 12-910). 
Provisions 
1. Stipulates the regulated party must pay all costs and legal fees of the prevailing party if the 
final administrative decision of an agency that regulates certain professions or occupations is 
appealed by the regulated party and the court affirms the final administrative decision. (Sec. 
1) 
☐ Prop 105 (45 votes)     ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes)      ☐ Emergency (40 votes) ☐ Fiscal Note