Arizona 2023 2023 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2757 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/05/2023

                      	HB 2757 
Initials JL 	Page 1 	Senate Engrossed 
 
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Fifty-sixth Legislature 
First Regular Session 
House: JUD DP 5-3-0-0 | 3
rd
 Read 31-28-1-0-0 
Senate: JUD DPA 6-1-0-0 | 3
rd
 Read 16-14-0-0-0 
 
HB 2757: court of appeals; retention election 
Sponsor: Representative Toma, LD 27 
Senate Engrossed 
Overview 
Replaces the current county-based retention election process for judges on the Arizona Court of 
Appeals with a statewide retention election process.  
History 
The Arizona Court of Appeals is the state's intermediate appellate court of record, established by 
Laws 1964, Chapter 102, § 1 as the first level of appeal from the superior court. It is comprised of 
two divisions, designated as Division 1, which is based in Phoenix, and Division 2, which is based 
in Tucson.  
Division 1 has 19 judges and consists of Maricopa, Yuma, La Paz, Mohave, Coconino, Yavapai, 
Navajo and Apache counties. Division 2 has 9 judges and consists of Pima, Pinal, Cochise, Santa 
Cruz, Greenlee, Graham and Gila counties. Both divisions hear and decide cases in three-judge 
panels, referred to as departments, and a majority of two out the three judges is sufficient to 
render a decision (A.R.S. § 12-120).  
Court of Appeals judges are appointed by the Governor to initial terms of at least two years 
pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. VI, § 37 before being subject to a retention election. The voters then 
consider the judges for retention every six years (A.R.S. § 12-120.01).  
Current law provides for county-based residency and retention election requirements for the 
judges on each division. Of the 19 judges on Division 1, 10 must be residents of and elected for 
retention by the voters of Maricopa county; 5 must be residents of and elected for retention by the 
voters of the counties in the division besides Maricopa; and 4 must be at-large judges, which may 
be residents of any county in the division. If an at-large judge is a resident of Maricopa county, 
the judge must be elected for retention by the voters of Maricopa county. Otherwise, the judge 
must be elected for retention by the voters of the other counties in the division besides Maricopa.  
Statute outlines a similar process for Division 2. Of its 9 judges, 4 must be residents of and elected 
for retention by the voters of Pima county; 2 must be residents of and elected for retention by the 
voters of the counties in the division besides Pima; and 3 must be at-large judges, which may be 
residents of any county in the division. If an at-large judge is a resident of Pima county, the judge 
must be elected for retention by the voters of Pima county. Otherwise, the at-large judge must be 
elected for retention by the voters of the other counties in the division besides Pima (A.R.S. § 12-
120.02). 
The designated post of duty for judges on Division 1 elected other than in Maricopa county, and 
similarly for the judges on Division 2 elected other than in Pima county, is deemed to be the 
judge's place of physical residence (A.R.S. § 12-120.10).  
 
    	HB 2757 
Initials JL 	Page 2 	Senate Engrossed 
Provisions 
1. Removes the county-based retention election requirements for judges on both divisions of the 
Court of Appeals. (Sec. 1) 
2. Requires that each Court of Appeals judge be elected for retention on a statewide basis at the 
general election next preceding the expiration of the judge's term in office and states that all 
otherwise eligible registered voters in Arizona are eligible to vote in these races. (Sec. 1) 
3. Deems the designated post of duty for Court of Appeals judges in Division 1, excluding 
Maricopa county, and in Division 2, excluding Pima county, to be the judge's place of physical 
residence. (Sec. 2) 
4. Makes a technical change. (Sec. 2) 
Senate Amendments 
1. Makes a technical correction.  
☐ Prop 105 (45 votes)     ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes)      ☐ Emergency (40 votes) ☐ Fiscal Note