The impact of HB 2166 is significant as it lays the groundwork for a more centralized and efficient voter registration system in Arizona. By authorizing the secretary of state to administer the fund and ensuring consistent financial support, the bill aims to improve the integrity and accessibility of voter registration. This legislation also implies that counties will have a shared financial responsibility in the upkeep of the voter registration database, which may foster better collaboration between state and local electoral officials.
Summary
House Bill 2166 focuses on the establishment and administration of a statewide voter registration database in Arizona. The bill amends section 16-168.01 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, detailing the state contributions towards the voter registration system fund. It requires counties to transfer specified funds to support the development and maintenance of this database, which is essential for ensuring accurate voter registration records across the state. The fund is to be administered by the secretary of state, and the bill includes provisions for continuous appropriations to ensure that funds remain available for this purpose.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 2166 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for enhanced electoral processes and voter accessibility. Supporters argue that a statewide database could streamline voter registration efforts and reduce errors, thus promoting greater participation in the electoral process. However, there may also be concerns regarding the financial implications for counties, particularly smaller ones, which could impact their budgets and resources.
Contention
One notable point of contention regarding HB 2166 is its conditional enactment, which ties the bill's effectiveness to the passage of House Bill 2590, relating to the qualification and registration of electors. This interdependency could provoke debates among legislators about the broader electoral reforms and their implications. Additionally, while there is general support for a statewide database, some may raise concerns about privacy and data security, as well as the potential burdens placed on counties with limited financial resources.