Arizona 2024 2024 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1309 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/30/2024

                      	SB 1309 
Initials AG 	Page 1 	House Engrossed 
 
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Fifty-sixth Legislature 
Second Regular Session 
Senate: HHS DP 7-0-0-0 | 3
rd
 Read 26-1-3-0 
House: HHS DP 10-0-0-0 
 
SB 1309: mental health evaluations; information; consent. 
Sponsor: Senator Miranda, LD 11 
House Engrossed 
Overview 
Expands requirements relating to applications and petitions for court-ordered behavioral 
health evaluations to provide additional information about the proposed patient. Prescribes 
duties and prohibitions of a screening or evaluation agency upon receipt of an application or 
petition for a court-ordered evaluation. Outlines which individuals may provide informed 
consent on behalf of a proposed patient for a voluntary evaluation. 
History 
Current law allows any responsible individual to apply for a court-ordered evaluation of a 
person who is alleged to be, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self or to others or a 
person with a persistent or acute disability or a grave disability and who is unwilling or 
unable to undergo a voluntary evaluation. The application for evaluation must include: 1) the 
name and address of the proposed patient, if known; 2) prescribed personal information such 
as the proposed patient's age, date of birth and social security number; 3) the name, address 
and relationship of the person who is applying for the evaluation; 4) a statement that the 
proposed patient is believed to be a danger to self or to others and the facts on which the 
statement is based; and 5) a statement that the applicant believes the proposed patient is in 
need of supervision, care and treatment and the facts on which the statement is based (A.R.S. 
§ 36-520). 
On receiving the application for evaluation, the screening agency, before filing a petition for 
court-ordered evaluation must provide prepetition screening within 48 hours excluding 
weekends and holidays when possible to determine whether there is reasonable cause to 
believe the allegations of the applicant for the court-ordered evaluation, whether the person 
will voluntarily receive an evaluation at a scheduled time and place and whether the person 
has a persistent or acute disability or a grave disability or is likely to present a danger to self 
or others until the voluntary evaluation. After prepetition screening has been completed, the 
screening agency must prepare a report of opinions and conclusions. If prepetition screening 
is not possible, the screening agency must prepare a report giving reasons why the screening 
was not possible and including opinions and conclusions of staff members who attempted to 
conduct prepetition screening or otherwise investigated the matter (A.R.S. § 36-521). 
Provisions 
1. Directs an application for a court-ordered mental health evaluation to include: 
a) the names and addresses of the proposed patient's agent under a health care power of 
attorney or mental health care power of attorney; 
b) a statement that the proposed patient is exhibiting behaviors that may be consistent 
with a mental disorder and is believed to be a danger to self or others;     	SB 1309 
Initials AG 	Page 2 	House Engrossed 
c) a statement with supporting facts from the applicant of whether the applicant believes 
the proposed patient is willing or able to undergo voluntary evaluation; 
d) a statement of the proposed patient's relevant mental health and treatment history;   
e) a statement, with supporting facts, that the applicant believes the proposed patient is 
in need of screening and evaluation; 
f) copies of all documents relating to guardianship or powers of attorney that allow the 
guardian or agent to consent to inpatient psychiatric treatment of the proposed 
patient;  
g) a statement of whether the applicant believes the patient is likely to cause or endure 
serious physical harm or injury without a period of inpatient observation, 
stabilization, assessment or emergency inpatient psychiatric hospitalization; and 
h) if known, the names and contact information of any persons who witnessed the 
behavior on which the application is based. (Sec. 2) 
2. Stipulates that an application made by a peace officer or prescribed health care 
professional does not need to be notarized and may be submitted as the written 
application with the applicant's original signature. (Sec. 2) 
3. Instructs the screening agency to immediately note on the application the time and date 
of receipt and to log the information on receipt of an application. (Sec. 2) 
4. Requires the screening and evaluation agencies to accept and consider relevant past and 
present behavioral health history of the proposed patient from persons who have a 
significant relationship with the proposed patient. (Sec. 2, 5) 
5. Permits the informed consent for a voluntary inpatient or outpatient evaluation to be 
provided by the person subject to the evaluation, the person's guardian with inpatient 
authority or the person's designated agent under an applicable power of attorney. (Sec. 3) 
6. Requires a petition for a court-ordered behavioral health evaluation to state the names 
and contact information of any persons who witnessed the behavior on which the petition 
is based. (Sec. 4) 
7. Forbids an evaluation agency from declining to process a petition or application for court-
ordered evaluation due to a lack of persons who witnessed the behavior that prompted 
the petition or application. (Sec. 4) 
8. Requires a petition that requests the court to determine that the patient is chronically 
resistant to treatment to allege the facts that support the request. (Sec. 6) 
9. Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1-6) 
☐ Prop 105 (45 votes)     ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes)      ☐ Emergency (40 votes) ☐ Fiscal Note