Arizona 2024 2024 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1435 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/19/2024

                      	SB 1435 
Initials JL 	Page 1 	Judiciary 
 
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Fifty-sixth Legislature 
Second Regular Session 
Senate: JUD DPA 6-0-1-0 | 3
rd
 Read DPA 19-9-2-0-0 
 
SB 1435: public entity liability; sexual offenses 
Sponsor: Senator Bolick, LD 2 
Committee on Judiciary 
Overview 
Subjects a public entity to liability for losses arising out of an act or omission by a public 
employee that is determined to be a felony sexual offense under certain circumstances.  
History 
A.R.S. title 12, chapter 7, article 2 governs actions against public entities or employees. 
Among other provisions, this article contains several sections granting public entities or 
employees immunity from liability in certain circumstances, including absolute immunity 
(A.R.S. § 12-820.01), qualified immunity (A.R.S. § 12-820.02) and other immunity (A.R.S. § 
12-820.05). Except as specifically provided in this article, its provisions do not affect, alter or 
otherwise modify any other rules of tort immunity regarding public entities and public 
officers as developed at common law and as established under the A.R.S. and the Arizona 
Constitution (A.R.S. § 12-820.05).  
One specific form of immunity in A.R.S. § 12-820.05, subsection B provides that a public 
entity is not liable for losses that arise out of and are directly attributable to an act or 
omission determined by a court to be a criminal felony by a public employee unless the public 
entity knew of the public employee's propensity for that action. However, this subsection does 
not apply to acts or omissions arising out of the operation or use of a motor vehicle.   
Provisions 
1. Excludes a public entity from immunity under A.R.S. § 12-820.05, subsection B for acts 
or omissions by a public employee arising out of a felony sexual offense if the victim is a 
minor or a child with a disability as defined in A.R.S. § 15-761 and one or more of the 
following conditions exist: 
a) the public entity was in violation of a statutory duty relating to obtaining information 
regarding the background of employees; 
b) the public entity or public employee had a statutory duty to report and failed to do so; 
c) clear and convincing evidence proves that the public entity failed to reasonably 
investigate or take reasonable action on an alleged violation of a written policy of the 
public entity relating to the safety or well-being of a minor or a child with a disability 
as defined in A.R.S. § 15-761 and the alleged violation of the written policy was 
substantially related to the harm that occurred. (Sec. 1) 
2. Specifies that these changes to A.R.S. § 12-820.05 apply only to acts or omissions 
involving sexual offenses that are committed on or after the effective date. (Sec. 3) 
3. Repeals these changes to A.R.S. § 12-820.05 on January 1, 2027. (Sec. 4) 
☐ Prop 105 (45 votes)     ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes)      ☐ Emergency (40 votes) ☐ Fiscal Note