SB 1435
Initials JL Page 1 Caucus & COW
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-sixth Legislature
Second Regular Session
Senate: JUD DPA 6-0-1-0 | 3
rd
Read DPA 19-9-2-0-0
House: JUD DPA 7-2-0-0
SB 1435: public entity liability; sexual offenses
Sponsor: Senator Bolick, LD 2
Caucus & COW
Overview
Subjects a public entity to liability for losses arising out of an act or omission by a public
employee that is determined to be a felony sexual offense under certain circumstances.
History
A.R.S. title 12, chapter 7, article 2 governs actions against public entities or employees.
Among other provisions, this article contains several sections granting public entities or
employees immunity from liability in certain circumstances, including absolute immunity
(A.R.S. § 12-820.01), qualified immunity (A.R.S. § 12-820.02) and other immunity (A.R.S. §
12-820.05). Except as specifically provided in this article, its provisions do not affect, alter or
otherwise modify any other rules of tort immunity regarding public entities and public
officers as developed at common law and as established under the A.R.S. and the Arizona
Constitution (A.R.S. § 12-820.05).
One specific form of immunity in A.R.S. § 12-820.05, subsection B provides that a public
entity is not liable for losses that arise out of and are directly attributable to an act or
omission determined by a court to be a criminal felony by a public employee unless the public
entity knew of the public employee's propensity for that action. However, this subsection does
not apply to acts or omissions arising out of the operation or use of a motor vehicle.
Provisions
1. Excludes a public entity from immunity under A.R.S. § 12-820.05, subsection B for acts
or omissions by a public employee arising out of a felony sexual offense if the victim is a
minor or a child with a disability as defined in A.R.S. § 15-761 and one or more of the
following conditions exist:
a) the public entity was in violation of a statutory duty relating to obtaining information
regarding the background of employees;
b) the public entity or public employee had a statutory duty to report and failed to do so;
c) clear and convincing evidence proves that the public entity failed to reasonably
investigate or take reasonable action on an alleged violation of a written policy of the
public entity relating to the safety or well-being of a minor or a child with a disability
as defined in A.R.S. § 15-761 and the alleged violation of the written policy was
substantially related to the harm that occurred. (Sec. 1)
2. Specifies that these changes to A.R.S. § 12-820.05 apply only to acts or omissions
involving sexual offenses that are committed on or after the effective date. (Sec. 3)
☐ Prop 105 (45 votes) ☐ Prop 108 (40 votes) ☐ Emergency (40 votes) ☐ Fiscal Note SB 1435
Initials JL Page 2 Caucus & COW
3. Repeals these changes to A.R.S. § 12-820.05 on January 1, 2027. (Sec. 2, 4)
Amendments
Committee on Judiciary
1. Limits the immunity exclusion to sexual offenses against a child with a disability, rather
than to a minor or a child with a disability.
2. Modifies the third condition mentioned in provision 1 above to provide that clear and
convincing evidence proves that the public entity should have known of the public
employee's propensity for harm related to the safety or well-being of a child with a
disability.
3. Extends the delayed repeal date from January 1, 2027 to January 1, 2035.
4. Makes conforming changes.