Arizona 2025 2025 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2059 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/21/2025

                    Assigned to NR 	FOR COMMITTEE 
 
 
 
 
ARIZONA STATE SENATE 
Fifty-Seventh Legislature, First Regular Session 
 
FACT SHEET FOR H.B. 2059 
 
natural resources; federal law; requirements 
Purpose 
Prohibits the state, any agency or political subdivision of the state and any employee, 
agency or political subdivision of the state acting in the employee's official capacity from using 
any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with outlined federal 
actions and programs. 
Background 
The Clean Air Act requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish 
minimum national standards for air quality and assigns primary responsibility to the states to assure 
compliance with the standards. Areas not meeting the standards, referred to as nonattainment 
areas, are required to implement specified air pollution control measures. The Clean Air Act 
requires State Implementation Plans to include adequate provisions to prevent sources within that 
state from contributing significantly to nonattainment in one or more downwind states, a 
requirement referred to as the Good Neighbor Plan Rule (Congress: Clean Air Act). 
The Clean Water Act establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants 
into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters. Under the 
Clean Water Act, the EPA has implemented pollution control programs such as setting wastewater 
industry standards and developing national water quality criteria recommendations for pollutants 
in surface waters (EPA: Clean Water Act). 
The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) enforces energy reduction goals for 
federal agencies and includes regulations relating to corporate average fuel economy standards, 
renewable fuel standards and appliance efficiency standards. EISA also requires the construction 
and rehabilitation of specified affordable housing to meet certain revised energy conservation 
requirements (EPA: EISA; Congress: EISA). 
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 provides a framework to conserve and protect 
endangered and threatened species and their habitats both domestically and abroad. In 1988, in an 
effort to reintroduce the endangered Mexican Wolf, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released 
the first captive Mexican Wolves into the Mexican Wolf Experimental Population Area in Arizona 
and New Mexico. The Endangered Species Act also requires that an incidental take permit be 
obtained for any taking of an endangered or threatened species incidental to an otherwise lawful 
activity (NOAA: Endangered Species Act; Taking of Endangered and Threatened Species and U.S. 
Fish & Wildlife Service). 
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this 
legislation.  FACT SHEET 
H.B. 2059 
Page 2 
 
 
Provisions 
1. Prohibits the state, any agency or political subdivision of the state and any employee, agency 
or political subdivision of the state acting in the employee's official capacity from using any 
personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with the following federal 
actions or programs: 
a) outlined programs or actions authorized by the Clean Air Act of 1963 as amended by the 
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; 
b) any waters of the United States that are regulated by the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act Amendments of 1972; 
c) energy efficiency standards for new construction of housing and urban development-financed 
and U.S. Department of Agriculture-financed housing authorized by Energy Independence and 
Security Act of 2007; or  
d) the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction Program and the Incidental Take Permit Program of the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973. 
2. Specifies that the prohibition on enforcing, administering or cooperating with outlined federal 
actions and programs does not prohibit the state or an agency, political subdivision or employee 
of the state or an agency or political subdivision of the state acting in the employee's official 
capacity from complying with a court order.  
3. Specifies that the prohibition on enforcing, administering or cooperating with the Mexican 
Wolf Reintroduction Program does not apply to the Livestock Loss Program that is 
administered and enforced by the Arizona Livestock Loss Board.  
4. Requires the superior court, in any proceeding in court to enforce compliance with the outlined 
federal actions and programs, to decide all questions of law and all questions of fact relating 
to the designated federal action or program without deference to any previous determination 
that may have been made on the question by a federal agency. 
5. Subjects any employee of the state or any agency or political subdivision of the state who 
knowingly violates the prohibition on enforcing, administering or cooperating with outlined 
federal actions and programs to: 
a) a civil penalty of up to $3,000, for a first violation; and 
b) a class 1 misdemeanor, for a second or subsequent violation. 
6. Stipulates that a person who is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor for a violation of the outlined 
prohibition is not eligible for probation, pardon, suspension of sentence or release on any basis 
until the person has served at least 60 days in jail.  
7. Prohibits any agency or political subdivision of the state from receiving grants monies from 
any source if the agency or political subdivision adopts a rule, order, ordinance, regulation or 
policy or otherwise takes any action that violates the prohibition on enforcing, administering 
or cooperating with outlined federal actions and programs. 
8. Prohibits any agency or political subdivision that violates the outlined prohibition from 
receiving grant monies from any source in the fiscal year following the year in which a final 
judicial determination in an action brought regarding the prohibition is made that finds that the 
agency or political subdivision adopted a rule, order, ordinance, regulation or policy or 
otherwise took action that violated the prohibition.  FACT SHEET 
H.B. 2059 
Page 3 
 
 
9. Contains a statement of legislative findings.  
10. Contains a severability clause.  
11. Designates this legislation as the Natural Resource Anticommandeering Act.  
12. Becomes effective on the general effective date. 
House Action 
NREW 2/18/25 DP 5-4-1-0 
3
rd
 Read 2/26/25  32-27-1 
Prepared by Senate Research 
March 21, 2025 
SB/slp