Arizona 2025 2025 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2868 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/28/2025

                     	AS PASSED BY COMMITTEE 
AMENDED 
ARIZONA STATE SENATE 
RESEARCH STAFF  
 
 
TO: MEMBERS OF THE SENATE 
 GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE 
DATE: March 25, 2025 
SUBJECT: Strike everything amendment to H.B. 2868, relating to government 
 
Purpose 
Outlines prohibitions for the state or a state agency, a city or town, county, community 
college district governing board and a state university relating to diversity, equity and inclusion 
(DEI). Requires the state or a state agency, a city or town, county, community college district 
governing board and a state university to adopt policies that appropriately discipline an employee 
or contractor that engages in conduct that violates the prohibitions relating to DEI. 
Background 
The State or state agencies may not require an employee to engage in, or use public monies 
for the purpose of training, orientation or therapy that presents blame or judgement on the basis of 
race, ethnicity or sex (A.R.S. § 41-1494). 
An employer may not discharge, refuse to hire or discriminate against any individual on 
the basis of compensation, disability, terms or conditions of employment because of race, color 
religion, sex, age, national origin or on the basis of disability. Additionally, an employer may not 
limit, segregate or classify employees or applicants for employment in any way that would deprive 
any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect the individual's status as 
an employee because of the individual's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or on the basis 
of disability. The outlined requirements relating to discrimination must not be interpreted to require 
that a less qualified individual be preferred over the better qualified individual simply because of 
race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or on the basis of disability (A.R.S. § 41-1463). 
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state General Fund associated with this legislation. 
Provisions 
1. Prohibits the state or a state agency, a city or town, county, community college district 
governing board or a university under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Board of Regents from: 
a) establishing or maintaining a DEI office; 
b) hiring or assigning an employee or contract with a third party to perform the duties of a 
DEI office; 
c) compelling, requiring, inducing or soliciting any person to provide a DEI statement or give 
preferential consideration to any person based on the provision of a DEI statement; 
d) giving preference on the basis of race, sex, color or ethnicity to an applicant for 
employment, an employee or a participant in any function of the entity; 
DANIEL LAWLER 
LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH INTERN 
 
ANNA NGUYEN 
LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH ANALYST 
GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE 
Telephone: (602) 926-3171  STRIKER MEMO – Amended  
H.B. 2868 
Page 2 
 
 
e) requiring as a condition of employment or enrollment any person to participate in DEI 
training, including a training program or activity designed or implemented in reference to 
race, color, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation and does not include a training, 
program or activity developed by an attorney and approved in writing by the entity's 
general counsel for the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with any applicable court order 
or state or federal law; or 
f) requiring enrollment in or completion of an academic course that promotes, in the context 
of contemporary American society, the tenants of DEI or the activities of a DEI office. 
2. Requires the state or a state agency, a city or town, county, community college district 
governing board or a state university to adopt policies and procedures for appropriately 
disciplining, including by termination, an employee or contractor that engages in conduct in 
violation of the DEI prohibitions. 
3. Defines DEI: 
a) means interrelated concepts that: 
i. describe or expose structures, systems or relations of power, privilege or subordination 
on the basis of race, sex, color, gender, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation; 
ii. describe methods to identify, dismantle or oppose structures, systems or relations; or 
iii. justify differential treatment of or special benefits conferred to individuals on the basis 
of race, sex, color, gender, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation; and 
b) includes unconscious or implicit bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgenderism, 
microaggressions, microinvalidation, group marginalization, antiracism, systemic 
oppression, ethnocentrism, structural racism, structural inequity, social justice, 
intersectionality, neopronouns, inclusive language, heteronormativity, disparate impact, 
gender identity, gender theory, racial or sexual privilege or related formulations of these 
concepts. 
4. Defines DEI office as an office, division or other unit established for: 
a) influencing hiring or employment practices in the entity with respect to race, sex, color or 
ethnicity, other than through the use of color-blind and sex-neutral hiring processes in 
accordance with any applicable state and federal antidiscrimination laws; 
b) promoting differential treatment of or providing special benefits to individuals on the basis 
of race, color or ethnicity; 
c) promoting policies or procedures designed or implemented in reference to race, color or 
ethnicity, other than policies or procedures approved in writing by the municipality's 
general counsel for the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with any applicable court order 
or state or federal law; or 
d) conducting trainings, programs or activities designed or implemented in reference to race, 
color, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation or DEI, other than trainings, programs 
or activities developed by an attorney and approved in writing by the entity's general 
counsel for the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with any applicable court order or 
state or federal law.  STRIKER MEMO – Amended  
H.B. 2868 
Page 3 
 
 
5. Specifies that the prohibitions relating to DEI on a community college district governing board 
and state university does not apply to: 
a) academic course instruction; 
b) scholarly research or a creative work by students, faculty or other research personnel or the 
dissemination of that research or work; 
c) an activity or a student organization registered with the community college or state 
university; 
d) guest speakers or performers on short-term engagements; 
e) a policy, practice, procedure, program or activity to enhance student academic achievement 
or postgraduate outcomes that is designed and implemented without regard to race, sex, 
color or ethnicity; 
f) data collection; or 
g) student recruitment or admissions. 
6. Specifies that the prohibitions relating to DEI on a community college district governing board 
and state university does not: 
a) limit or prohibit a community college or state university or an employee from applying for 
a grant, complying with the terms of accreditation by an accrediting agency or submitting 
to the grantor or accrediting agency a statement that: 
i. highlights the institution's work in supporting first generation students, low-income 
students or underserved student populations; or 
ii. certifies compliance with state and federal antidiscrimination laws. 
b) prohibit bona fide qualifications based on sex, which are conductive to the normal 
operation of public universities; or 
c) prohibit identifying and discussing historical movements, ideologies or instances of racial 
hatred or discrimination, including slavery, Indian removal, the Holocaust or Japanese 
American internment. 
7. Prohibits a community college or state university from spending monies appropriated to the 
institution in any given FY until the institution submits to the Legislature a report that certifies 
the institution's compliance with the prohibitions relating to DEI during the preceding FY. 
8. Requires the community college and state university or its designee, in the interim, to testify 
before the Senate Education Committee and the House of Representatives Education 
Committee, or its successor committees at a public hearing of each committee regarding the 
institution's compliance with the outlined prohibitions relating to DEI. 
9. Allows a student or employee of a community college or state university who is required to 
participate in any training that violates the outlined prohibitions relating to DEI to bring an 
action against the institution for injunctive or declaratory relief. 
10. Becomes effective on the general effective date. 
Amendments Adopted by Committee 
1. Adopted the strike-everything amendment.  STRIKER MEMO – Amended  
H.B. 2868 
Page 4 
 
 
2. Requires, rather than prohibits, the outlined entities to policies and procedures appropriately 
disciplining an employee or contractor that violates the outlined DEI prohibitions. 
3. Makes technical and conforming changes. 
Senate Action 
GOV 3/26/25 DPA/SE 4-3-0