California 2009 2009-2010 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1050 Amended / Bill

Filed 04/16/2009

 BILL NUMBER: AB 1050AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 16, 2009 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 26, 2009 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Ma FEBRUARY 27, 2009 An act to amend Section 3042 of the Family Code, relating to child custody. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1050, as amended, Ma. Child custody: preferences of child. Existing law requires the family court, if a child is of sufficient age and capacity to  reason so as to  form an intelligent preference as to custody, to consider and give due weight to the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody. This bill would require the family court to consider and give due weight to the wishes of a child in making an order granting or modifying custody, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation.  The bill would provide, for purposes of this provision, that a child shall be presumed to be of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference if the child is 10 years of age or older.  Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 3042 of the Family Code is amended to read: 3042. (a) If a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody, particularly if the health, safety, or welfare of the child is at issue.  A child shall be presumed to be of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference if the child is 10 years of age or older..  (b) In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 765 of the Evidence Code, the court shall control the examination of a child witness so as to protect the best interests of the child. The court may preclude the calling of the child as a witness if the best interests of the child so dictate and may provide alternative means of obtaining information regarding the child's preferences.