California 2009 2009-2010 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB261 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/24/2009

 BILL NUMBER: SB 261INTRODUCED BILL TEXT INTRODUCED BY Senators Dutton and Ducheny (Coauthor: Senator Hollingsworth) FEBRUARY 24, 2009 An act relating to water. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 261, as introduced, Dutton. Water use. Existing law requires the Department of Water Resources to convene an independent technical panel to provide information to the department and the Legislature on new demand management measures, technologies, and approaches. "Demand management measures" means those water conservation measures, programs, and incentives that prevent the waste of water and promote the reasonable and efficient use and reuse of available supplies. This bill would state legislative findings and declarations relating to water use. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) The Governor's call for a 20 percent reduction in statewide, urban per capita water use is an important component of a comprehensive package of water management strategies necessary to ensure sufficient water supplies for California's residential and commercial uses. (b) The implementation of this goal should allow for flexible implementation that provides for the option of regional-level or local implementation. (c) Meeting the statewide conservation goal should be pursued in a manner that clearly recognizes all water use efficiency efforts, including water recycling, stormwater capture, and cooperative efforts among agencies. (d) Existing, well-established water management planning processes, including integrated water management plans, must be utilized to provide for the most effective, cooperative, efficient, and expedient progress toward the 20 percent statewide goal. (e) General statutory direction to state, regional, and local implementing agencies should allow for implementation that reflects the need to take into account unique local factors, including housing density and lot sizes, climatic conditions, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses, and year-to-year weather changes. (f) To date, statewide conservation data is inadequate for the purpose of assessing past and ongoing conservation efforts. Standardized data collection and analysis will provide the best means for tracking progress toward the statewide conservation goal and ensuring accountability among local and regional agencies. (g) Goals pertaining to commercial and industrial uses must recognize the very different commercial and industrial uses among regions and local agencies and should not unreasonably combine the factors of commercial uses and population. Progress toward commercial and industrial water conservation can best be achieved through potential development of best management practices and local and regional engagement with local commercial and industrial operations. (h) Any per capita water use goals must be utilized in a fair, appropriate, and productive manner at the statewide and regional level and should not be applied in a manner that does not account for the unique factors associated with individual agency conditions. (i) Water conservation and water use efficiency efforts shall be undertaken for the purpose of enhancing watershed sustainability. (j) Statutory revisions and administrative actions that provide direction for implementation of the urban water use conservation goal should not be crafted in a manner that could affect or imperil existing water rights.