BILL NUMBER: AB 215AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 4, 2015 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 6, 2015 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Alejo FEBRUARY 2, 2015 An act to amend Section 53260 of the Government Code, relating to employment. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 215, as amended, Alejo. Local agency employment contracts: maximum cash settlement. Existing law requires all employment contracts between an employee and a local agency employer to contain a provision that provides for the amount of a cash settlement that may be paid out if the contract is terminated, as specified. Existing law provides that the maximum settlement that an employee can receive is an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by the number of months left on the unexpired term of the contract, or, if the unexpired terms of the contract is greater than 18 months, an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 18. This bill would provide that in the case of a district superintendent of schools, for contracts of employment negotiated on or after January 1, 2016, the maximum cash settlement shall be an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 12, or, if the employee was terminated for cause, an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 6. Existing law limits the amount of a cash or noncash settlement that a local agency employer may provide its district superintendent of schools to an amount no greater than the superintendent's monthly salary multiplied by zero to 6, if it terminates the superintendent's contract of employment and confirms pursuant to an independent audit that the superintendent engaged in fraud, misappropriation of funds, or other illegal fiscal practices. In this case, existing law requires an administrative law judge, after a hearing, to determine the amount of the cash settlement. Thisbill would,bill, with regard to a contract for employment negotiated on or after January 1, 2016, would change the maximum cash or noncash settlement amount that may be paid by a local agency employer to its district superintendent of schools under these provisions to an amount no greater than the superintendent's monthly salary multiplied by zero to 3. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 53260 of the Government Code is amended to read: 53260. (a) All contracts of employment between an employee and a local agency employer shall include a provision that provides that regardless of the term of the contract, if the contract is terminated, the maximum cash settlement that an employee may receive shall be an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by the number of months left on the unexpired term of the contact, with the following exceptions: (1) If the unexpired term of the contract is greater than 18 months, the maximum cash settlement shall be an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 18. (2) In the case of a district superintendent of schools, for contracts of employment negotiated on or after January 1, 2016, the maximum cash settlement shall be an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 12, or, if the employee was terminated for cause, an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee multiplied by 6. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), if a local agency employer, including an administrator appointed by the Superintendent, terminates its contract of employment with its district superintendent of schools, that local agency employermayshall not provide a cash or noncash settlement to its superintendent in an amount greater than the superintendent's monthly salary multiplied by zero to 3 if the local agency employer believes, and subsequently confirms, pursuant to an independent audit, that the superintendent has engaged in fraud, misappropriation of funds, or other illegal fiscal practices. The amount of the cash settlement described in this paragraph shall be determined by an administrative law judge after a hearing. (2) This subdivision applies only to a contract for employment negotiated on or after January 1, 2016. (c) The cash settlementformulaformulas described in subdivisions (a) and (b) are maximumceiling on theamounts that may be paid by a local agency employer to an employee andisnot a target or example of the amount of the cash settlement to be paid by a local agency employer to an employee in all contract termination cases.