California 2015 2015-2016 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB701 Amended / Bill

Filed 06/16/2016

 BILL NUMBER: AB 701AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 16, 2016 AMENDED IN SENATE SEPTEMBER 4, 2015 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 7, 2015 INTRODUCED BY Assembly  Member   Cristina Garcia   Members   Cristina Garcia   and Eggman   (   Coauthors:   Assembly Members   Bonilla,   Bonta,   Gatto,   Gipson,   Gomez,   Lopez,   and Williams   )   (   Coauthors:   Senators   Beall   and Leyva   )  FEBRUARY 25, 2015 An act to amend Sections  19817 and 19858 of the Business and Professions   261, 261.5, 262, and 266c of the Penal  Code, relating to  gaming.   sex crimes.  LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 701, as amended, Cristina Garcia.  Gaming.   Sex crimes: Rape.   Existing law defines rape and spousal rape as an act of sexual intercourse accomplished under specified circumstances indicating lack of consent, force, or duress, as specified. Existing law defines unlawful sexual intercourse as an act of sexual intercourse with a person who is a minor, as specified. Existing law additionally makes it unlawful to induce a person to engage in sexual intercourse, sexual penetration, oral copulation, or sodomy when his or her consent is procured by false or fraudulent representation or pretense that is made with the intent to create fear, and which does induce fear, and that would cause a reasonable person in like circumstances to act contrary to the person's free will, and does cause the victim to so act.   This bill would change the definition of rape, spousal rape, and unlawful sexual intercourse to instead mean penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, under the specified conditions. The bill would also make it a crime to induce another person to engage in penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, when his or her consent is procured by false or fraudulent representation or pretense that is made with the intent to create fear, and which does induce fear, and that would cause a reasonable person in like circumstances to act contrary to the victim's free will, and does cause the victim to so act. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.   The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.   This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.   Existing law, the Gambling Control Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of various legalized gambling activities and establishments by the California Gambling Control Commission and the investigation and enforcement of those activities and establishments by the Department of Justice. A willful violation of any provision of the act for which a penalty is not expressly provided, is punishable as a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the commission to establish a 10-member Gaming Policy Advisory Committee for the purpose of discussing matters of controlled gambling regulatory policy and other relevant gambling-related issues. The committee is composed of representatives of controlled gambling licensees and members of the general public in equal numbers.   This bill would increase the membership of the committee from 10 to 12 members, and would instead require the committee to be composed of 5 representatives of controlled gambling licensees, 5 members of the general public, and 2 representatives from the Department of Justice.   Under the act, a person is deemed unsuitable to hold a license to own a gambling establishment if the person, or any partner, officer, director, or shareholder of the person, has any financial interest in any business or organization that is engaged in a prohibited form of gambling, whether within or without this state, except as specified.   This bill would exempt from that provision a person or entity that has (1) held a license in good standing as an owner of a gambling establishment for at least 5 years as of January 1, 2015, (2) has notified the California Gambling Control Commission and the Department of Justice, has received commission approval, after completion of a background check conducted by the department, to obtain a financial interest in a business or organization within the United States that conducts lawful gambling outside of California that, if conducted within California, would be unlawful, (3) and has paid the commission and the department for the reasonable costs of the investigation and approval for obtaining the financial interest. The bill would require the commission to adopt necessary regulations addressing, at a minimum, mandatory periodic reporting to the department by a licensee regarding the ownership and operations of a business or organization within the United States that conducts lawful gambling outside of California that, if conducted in California, would be unlawful.   The bill would make it unlawful for any cross-promotion or marketing, as defined, to occur between the business or organization within the United States that conducts lawful gambling outside of California that, if conducted within California, would be unlawful, and the gambling establishment, as described. The bill would prohibit, among other things, a licensee, in connection with a business or organization that conducts lawful gambling outside of California that, if conducted within California, would be unlawful, from knowingly engaging in an activity or entering into an association that is unsuitable for the licensee because that activity or association poses an unreasonable threat to the control of gambling in this state. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.   The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.   This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.  Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION 1.   Section 261 of the   Penal Code   is amended to read:  261. (a) Rape is an act of  sexual intercourse   penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person,  accomplished with a person not the spouse of the  perpetrator,   defendant,  under any of the following circumstances: (1)  Where a person   If   the victim  is incapable, because of a mental disorder or developmental or physical disability, of giving legal consent, and this is known or reasonably should be known to the person committing the act.   defendant.  Notwithstanding the existence of a conservatorship pursuant to  the provisions of  the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1 (commencing with Section 5000) of Division 5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code), the prosecuting attorney shall prove, as an element of the crime, that a mental disorder or developmental or physical disability rendered the  alleged  victim incapable of giving consent. (2)  Where it   If the act  is accomplished against  a person's   the victim's  will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the  person   victim  or another. (3)  Where a person   If   the victim  is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by the  accused.   defendant.  (4)  Where a person   If the victim  is at the time unconscious of the nature of the act, and this is known to the  accused.   defendant.  As used in this paragraph, "unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting because the victim meets any one of the following conditions: (A) Was unconscious or asleep. (B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act occurred. (C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the  perpetrator' s   defendant's  fraud in fact. (D) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the  perpetrator' s   defendant's  fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a professional purpose when it served no professional purpose. (5)  Where a person   If a victim  submits under the belief that the person committing the act is someone known to the victim other than the  accused,   defendant,  and this belief is induced by any artifice, pretense, or concealment practiced by the  accused,   defendant,  with intent to induce the belief. (6)  Where   If  the act is accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or any other person, and there is a reasonable possibility that the  perpetrator   defendant  will execute the threat. As used in this paragraph, "threatening to retaliate" means a threat to kidnap or falsely imprison, or to inflict extreme pain, serious bodily injury, or death. (7)  Where   If    the act is accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to use the authority of a public official to incarcerate, arrest, or deport the victim or another, and the victim has a reasonable belief that the  perpetrator   defendant  is a public official. As used in this paragraph, "public official" means a person employed by a governmental agency who has the authority, as part of that position, to incarcerate, arrest, or deport another. The  perpetrator   defendant  does not actually have to be a public official. (b) As used in this section, "duress" means a direct or implied threat of force, violence, danger, or retribution sufficient to coerce a reasonable person of ordinary susceptibilities to perform an act which otherwise would not have been performed, or acquiesce in an act to which one otherwise would not have submitted. The total circumstances, including the age of the victim, and his or her relationship to the defendant, are factors to consider in appraising the existence of duress. (c) As used in this section, "menace" means any threat, declaration, or act which shows an intention to inflict an injury upon another.  SEC. 2.   Section 261.5 of the   Penal Code   is amended to read:  261.5. (a) Unlawful sexual intercourse is an act of  sexual intercourse   penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person,  accomplished with a person who is not the spouse of the  perpetrator,   defendant,  if the person is a minor. For the purposes of this section, a "minor" is a person under  the age of  18 years  of age  and an "adult" is a person who is at least 18 years of age. (b)  Any person   A defendant  who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is not more than three years older or three years younger than the  perpetrator,   defendant,  is guilty of a misdemeanor. (c)  Any   A    person who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is more than three years younger than the  perpetrator   defendant  is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170. (d)  Any   A  person 21 years of age or older who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is under 16 years of age is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for two, three, or four years. (e) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an adult who engages in an act of  unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor in violation of this section may be liable for civil penalties in the following amounts: (A) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor less than two years younger than the adult is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000). (B) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor at least two years younger than the adult is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000). (C) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor at least three years younger than the adult is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (D) An adult over the age of 21 years who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 years of age is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). (2) The district attorney may bring actions to recover civil penalties pursuant to this subdivision. From the amounts collected for each case, an amount equal to the costs of pursuing the action shall be deposited with the treasurer of the county in which the judgment was entered, and the remainder shall be deposited in the Underage Pregnancy Prevention Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. Amounts deposited in the Underage Pregnancy Prevention Fund may be used only for the purpose of preventing underage pregnancy upon appropriation by the Legislature. (3) In addition to any punishment imposed under this section, the judge may assess a fine not to exceed seventy dollars ($70) against  any   a  person who violates this section with the proceeds of this fine to be used in accordance with Section 1463.23. The court  shall, however,   shall  take into consideration the defendant's ability to pay, and  no   a  defendant shall  not  be denied probation because of his or her inability to pay the fine permitted under this subdivision.  SEC. 3.   Section 262 of the   Penal Code   is amended to read:  262. (a) Rape of a person who is the spouse of the  perpetrator   defendant  is an act of  sexual intercourse   penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person,  accomplished under any of the following circumstances: (1)  Where it   If   the ac   t  is accomplished against a  person's   victim's  will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the  person   victim  or another. (2)  Where   If  a  person   victim  is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known, by the  accused.   defendant.  (3)  Where   If  a  person is   victim is,  at the  time   time,  unconscious of the nature of the act, and this is known to the  accused.   defendant.  As used in this paragraph, "unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting because the victim meets one of the following conditions: (A) Was unconscious or asleep. (B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act occurred. (C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the essential characteristics of the act due to the  perpetrator' s   defendant's  fraud in fact. (4)  Where   If    the act is accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or any other person, and there is a reasonable possibility that the  perpetrator   defe   ndant  will execute the threat. As used in this paragraph, "threatening to retaliate" means a threat to kidnap or falsely imprison, or to inflict extreme pain, serious bodily injury, or death. (5)  Where   If  the act is accomplished against the victim's will by threatening to use the authority of a public official to incarcerate, arrest, or deport the victim or another, and the victim has a reasonable belief that the  perpetrator   defendant  is a public official. As used in this paragraph, "public official" means a person employed by a governmental agency who has the authority, as part of that position, to incarcerate, arrest, or deport another. The  perpetrator   defendant  does not actually have to be a public official. (b) As used in this section, "duress" means a direct or implied threat of force, violence, danger, or retribution sufficient to coerce a reasonable person of ordinary susceptibilities to perform an act which otherwise would not have been performed, or acquiesce in an act to which one otherwise would not have submitted. The total circumstances, including the age of the  victim,   victim  and his or her relationship to the defendant, are factors to consider in apprising the existence of duress. (c) As used in this section, "menace" means any threat, declaration, or act that shows an intention to inflict an injury upon another. (d) If probation is granted upon conviction of a violation of this section, the conditions of probation may include, in lieu of a fine, one or both of the following requirements: (1) That the defendant make payments to a battered women's shelter, up to a maximum of one thousand dollars ($1,000). (2) That the defendant reimburse the victim for reasonable costs of counseling and other reasonable expenses that the court finds are the direct result of the defendant's offense. For any order to pay a fine, make payments to a battered women's shelter, or pay restitution as a condition of probation under this subdivision, the court shall make a determination of the defendant's ability to pay. In no event shall any order to make payments to a battered women's shelter be made if it would impair the ability of the defendant to pay direct restitution to the victim or court-ordered child support.  Where   If  the injury to a married person is caused in whole or in part by the criminal acts of his or her spouse in violation of this section, the community property may not be used to discharge the liability of the offending spouse for restitution to the injured spouse, required by Section 1203.04, as operative on or before August 2, 1995, or Section 1202.4, or to a shelter for costs with regard to the injured spouse and dependents, required by this section, until all separate property of the offending spouse is exhausted.  SEC. 4.   Section 266c of the   Penal Code   is amended to read:  266c.  (a)    Every person who induces any other person to engage in  sexual intercourse, sexual penetration, oral copulation, or sodomy   penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person,  when  his or her   the victim's  consent is procured by false or fraudulent representation or pretense that is made with the intent to create fear, and which does induce fear, and that would cause a reasonable person in like circumstances to act contrary to the person's free will, and does cause the victim to so act, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison for two, three, or four years.  As   (b)    As  used in this section, "fear" means the fear of physical injury or death to the  person   victim  or to any relative of the  person   victim  or member of the  person's   victim's  family.  SEC. 5.   No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.   SECTION 1.   Section 19817 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read: 19817. The commission shall establish and appoint a Gaming Policy Advisory Committee of 12 members. The committee shall be composed of five representatives of controlled gambling licensees, five members of the general public, and two members from the department. The executive director shall, from time to time, convene the committee for the purpose of discussing matters of controlled gambling regulatory policy and any other relevant gambling-related issue. The recommendations concerning gambling policy made by the committee shall be presented to the commission, but shall be deemed advisory and not binding on the commission in the performance of its duties or functions. The committee may not advise the commission on Indian gaming.   SEC. 2.   Section 19858 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read: 19858. (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b), (c), and (g), a person shall be deemed to be unsuitable to hold a state gambling license to own a gambling establishment if the person, or any partner, officer, director, or shareholder of the person, has any financial interest in any business or organization that is engaged in any form of gambling prohibited by Section 330 of the Penal Code, whether within or without this state. (b) Subdivision (a) does not apply to a publicly traded racing association, a qualified racing association, or any person who is licensed pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 19852. (c) Subdivision (a) does not apply to a person or entity that meets all of the following criteria: (1) Holds a license in good standing as an owner of a gambling establishment pursuant to this chapter for at least five years as of January 1, 2015. For purposes of this subdivision, "good standing" means that the owner's state gambling license is not the subject of outstanding allegations by the department for any violation of the Gambling Control Act. (2) Has notified the commission and the department and received commission approval, after completion of a background check conducted by the department, to obtain a financial interest in another business or organization within the United States that conducts lawful gambling outside of California that, if conducted within California, would be unlawful. A licensee shall provide the department with any information pertaining to the licensee's proposed participation in that business or organization as the department may request. The commission shall not grant a temporary approval under this section. (3) Has paid the commission and the department for the reasonable costs incurred by the commission and the department for the investigation and approval to obtain the financial interest described in paragraph (2). (d) It is unlawful for any cross-promotion or marketing to occur between the business or organization described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) and the gambling establishment described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c). For purposes of this subdivision, "cross-promotion or marketing" means the offering to any customers of the gambling establishment anything of value related to visiting or gambling at the business or organization described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c). (e) A licensee shall not, in connection with a business or organization described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c), knowingly do any of the following: (1) Violate a foreign, federal, tribal, state, county, city, or township law, regulation, ordinance, or rule, or any equivalent thereof, concerning the conduct of gambling. (2) Fail to conduct the operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required for gambling in this state. (3) Engage in an activity or enter into an association that is unsuitable for a licensee because that activity or association does any of the following: (A) Poses an unreasonable threat to the control of gambling in this state. (B) Reflects or tends to reflect discredit or disrepute upon this state or gaming in this state. (C) Is contrary to the public policy of this state concerning gaming. (4) Engage in an activity or enter into an association that interferes with the ability of this state to collect all license fees imposed by this chapter. (5) Employ, contract with, or associate with, a person whom the commission has found guilty of cheating or to whom the commission has denied a gambling license, or finding of suitability, on the ground of unsuitability. (f) The commission shall adopt necessary regulations addressing, at a minimum, mandatory periodic reporting to the department by a licensee regarding the ownership and operations of a business or organization described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c). (g) Subdivision (a) does not apply to a person who meets all of the following criteria: (1) The person is licensed or had an application to be licensed on file with the commission on or before February 1, 2013. (2) The person has a financial interest in a business or organization engaged in gambling prohibited by Section 330 of the Penal Code that was closed and was not engaged in prohibited gambling at the time the person was either licensed or had filed an application to be licensed with the commission. (3) The person has a financial interest in a gambling establishment that is located on any portion of, or contiguous to, the grounds on which a racetrack is or had been previously located and horserace meetings were authorized to be conducted by the California Horse Racing Board on or before January 1, 2012. (4) The grounds upon which the gambling establishment described in paragraph (3) is located are directly or indirectly owned by a racetrack limited partnership owner. For purposes of this paragraph, a "racetrack limited partnership owner" is defined as a limited partnership, or a number of related limited partnerships, that is or are at least 80 percent capitalized by limited partners that are an "institutional investor" as defined in subdivision (w) of Section 19805, an "employee benefit plan" as defined in Section 1002(3) of Title 29 of the United States Code, or an investment company that manages a state university endowment. (h) Within three years of the date the closed business or organization reopens or becomes engaged in any form of gambling prohibited by Section 330 of the Penal Code, a person described in subdivision (g) shall either divest that person's interest in the business or organization, or divest that person's interest in the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment for which the person is licensed or has applied to be licensed by the commission. (i) A person described in subdivision (g) shall inform the commission within 30 days of the date on which a business or organization in which the person has a financial interest begins to engage in any form of gambling prohibited by Section 330 of the Penal Code. (j) During the three-year divestment period described in subdivision (h), it is unlawful for any cross-promotion or marketing to occur between the business or organization that is engaged in any form of gambling prohibited by Section 330 of the Penal Code and the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (g). For purposes of this subdivision, "cross-promotion or marketing" means the offering to any customers of the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment anything of value related to visiting or gambling at the business or organization engaged in any form of gambling prohibited by Section 330 of the Penal Code. (k) During the three-year divestment period described in subdivision (h), any funds used in connection with the capital improvement of the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (g) shall not be provided from the gaming revenues of either the business or organization engaged in gaming prohibited under Section 330 of the Penal Code. (l) If, at the end of the three-year divestment period described in subdivision (h), any person described in subdivision (g) has not divested his or her interest in either the gambling enterprise or gambling establishment or the business or organization engaged in any form of gaming prohibited under Section 330 of the Penal Code, the prohibitions of Section 19858 as it read on January 1, 2013, apply.   SEC. 3.   No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.