Enrolled June 22, 2018 Passed IN Senate June 14, 2018 Passed IN Assembly June 21, 2018 Amended IN Senate May 14, 2018 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 172Introduced by Assembly Member Low(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Cervantes, Eggman, and Gloria)(Principal coauthors: Senators Galgiani, Lara, Wiener, and Atkins)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Berman, Bloom, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Frazier, Friedman, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Quirk, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, and Weber)February 07, 2018Relative to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 172, Low. Historical state anti-LGBT laws.This measure would apologize for the enactment of past discriminatory laws and constitutional provisions that resulted in the persecution and oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their communities. The measure would also express the Legislatures commitment to taking the steps needed to be a fully inclusive state and preserving the rights of all people.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO Bill TextWHEREAS, Historically, California, like other states of this nation, charged people with crimes due to their sexuality and gender identity; andWHEREAS, Although laws criminalizing sexual conduct were established in statute and judicial interpretation, these laws were rarely enforced against consenting adults in private and within a heterosexual marital relationship, but rather served as a basis for criminalizing homosexuality and legitimizing discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people; andWHEREAS, As early as 1850, in the territory of California, a common law statute with historical roots in English law was established providing for the illegalization of sodomy and setting the penalty at five years to life; andWHEREAS, The 1872 California Criminal Code contained a similar prohibition; andWHEREAS, From the late 1800s onward, California jurisdictions also widely employed vagrancy, disorderly conduct, and indecent exposure laws to prosecute same-sex intimacy and behavior outside of gender norms; andWHEREAS, Public indecency statutes and unlawful masquerade laws were applied to permit police to harass and sometimes arrest people who were considered deviant or gender-bending; andWHEREAS, In 1909, state law allowed for the sterilization of convicted and imprisoned sex offenders if they showed recidivism in prison towards being a moral or sexual pervert, including those offenders committed for sodomy and oral sex acts; andWHEREAS, In 1915, Section 288a of the Penal Code was enacted, making specific oral sex acts felonies and punishable by a maximum of 15 years in prison; andWHEREAS, In 1921, a statute banned any act ... which openly outrages public decency; andWHEREAS, In 1939, California enacted a sexual psychopath law, which was used to commit numerous LGBT people for involuntary psychiatric incarceration and gruesome medical treatments; andWHEREAS, In 1947, California enacted a statewide registration for sex offenders. Before laws criminalizing specified acts between same-sex couples were repealed and enforcement of laws often used against LGBT people evolved, LGBT individuals convicted of these offenses were forced to register as sex offenders; andWHEREAS, Eventually reform efforts began to extend some protections to LGBT people by expanding privacy rights and decriminalizing private consensual activity between adults; andWHEREAS, However, state law enacted in 1977 defined marriage as between one man and one woman. Proposition 22 was enacted by California voters in March 2000 to prevent marriage between same-sex couples; andWHEREAS, In May 2008, the California Supreme Court struck down Proposition 22 but the ruling was superseded when Proposition 8 passed that same year, reinstating a bar on same-sex marriages; andWHEREAS, The granting of same-sex marriages ultimately began again in California in 2013 following the United States Supreme Court decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, which restored the effect of a federal district court ruling that overturned Proposition 8 as unconstitutional; andWHEREAS, It is only right that this state formally apologize for the enactment and enforcement of laws used to persecute and oppress LGBT individuals and their communities; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature apologizes for the enactment of past discriminatory laws and constitutional provisions that resulted in the persecution and oppression of LGBT individuals and their communities, and which forced them to live in fear of unjust prosecutions and public shaming. The Legislature apologizes for these acts and reaffirms its commitment to preserving the rights of all people; and be it furtherResolved, That even though the Legislature is apologizing for the previous laws enacted in California, the Legislature is committed to taking the steps needed to be a fully inclusive state and preserving the rights of all people. No apology can make up for the years of discrimination; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
Enrolled June 22, 2018 Passed IN Senate June 14, 2018 Passed IN Assembly June 21, 2018 Amended IN Senate May 14, 2018 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 172Introduced by Assembly Member Low(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Cervantes, Eggman, and Gloria)(Principal coauthors: Senators Galgiani, Lara, Wiener, and Atkins)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Berman, Bloom, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Frazier, Friedman, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Quirk, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, and Weber)February 07, 2018Relative to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 172, Low. Historical state anti-LGBT laws.This measure would apologize for the enactment of past discriminatory laws and constitutional provisions that resulted in the persecution and oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their communities. The measure would also express the Legislatures commitment to taking the steps needed to be a fully inclusive state and preserving the rights of all people.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO
Enrolled June 22, 2018 Passed IN Senate June 14, 2018 Passed IN Assembly June 21, 2018 Amended IN Senate May 14, 2018
Enrolled June 22, 2018
Passed IN Senate June 14, 2018
Passed IN Assembly June 21, 2018
Amended IN Senate May 14, 2018
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 172
Introduced by Assembly Member Low(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Cervantes, Eggman, and Gloria)(Principal coauthors: Senators Galgiani, Lara, Wiener, and Atkins)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Berman, Bloom, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Frazier, Friedman, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Quirk, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, and Weber)February 07, 2018
Introduced by Assembly Member Low(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Cervantes, Eggman, and Gloria)(Principal coauthors: Senators Galgiani, Lara, Wiener, and Atkins)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Berman, Bloom, Bonta, Burke, Caballero, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Frazier, Friedman, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Quirk, Rendon, Reyes, Rodriguez, Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, and Weber)
February 07, 2018
Relative to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
ACR 172, Low. Historical state anti-LGBT laws.
This measure would apologize for the enactment of past discriminatory laws and constitutional provisions that resulted in the persecution and oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their communities. The measure would also express the Legislatures commitment to taking the steps needed to be a fully inclusive state and preserving the rights of all people.
This measure would apologize for the enactment of past discriminatory laws and constitutional provisions that resulted in the persecution and oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their communities. The measure would also express the Legislatures commitment to taking the steps needed to be a fully inclusive state and preserving the rights of all people.
## Digest Key
## Bill Text
WHEREAS, Historically, California, like other states of this nation, charged people with crimes due to their sexuality and gender identity; and
WHEREAS, Although laws criminalizing sexual conduct were established in statute and judicial interpretation, these laws were rarely enforced against consenting adults in private and within a heterosexual marital relationship, but rather served as a basis for criminalizing homosexuality and legitimizing discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people; and
WHEREAS, As early as 1850, in the territory of California, a common law statute with historical roots in English law was established providing for the illegalization of sodomy and setting the penalty at five years to life; and
WHEREAS, The 1872 California Criminal Code contained a similar prohibition; and
WHEREAS, From the late 1800s onward, California jurisdictions also widely employed vagrancy, disorderly conduct, and indecent exposure laws to prosecute same-sex intimacy and behavior outside of gender norms; and
WHEREAS, Public indecency statutes and unlawful masquerade laws were applied to permit police to harass and sometimes arrest people who were considered deviant or gender-bending; and
WHEREAS, In 1909, state law allowed for the sterilization of convicted and imprisoned sex offenders if they showed recidivism in prison towards being a moral or sexual pervert, including those offenders committed for sodomy and oral sex acts; and
WHEREAS, In 1915, Section 288a of the Penal Code was enacted, making specific oral sex acts felonies and punishable by a maximum of 15 years in prison; and
WHEREAS, In 1921, a statute banned any act ... which openly outrages public decency; and
WHEREAS, In 1939, California enacted a sexual psychopath law, which was used to commit numerous LGBT people for involuntary psychiatric incarceration and gruesome medical treatments; and
WHEREAS, In 1947, California enacted a statewide registration for sex offenders. Before laws criminalizing specified acts between same-sex couples were repealed and enforcement of laws often used against LGBT people evolved, LGBT individuals convicted of these offenses were forced to register as sex offenders; and
WHEREAS, Eventually reform efforts began to extend some protections to LGBT people by expanding privacy rights and decriminalizing private consensual activity between adults; and
WHEREAS, However, state law enacted in 1977 defined marriage as between one man and one woman. Proposition 22 was enacted by California voters in March 2000 to prevent marriage between same-sex couples; and
WHEREAS, In May 2008, the California Supreme Court struck down Proposition 22 but the ruling was superseded when Proposition 8 passed that same year, reinstating a bar on same-sex marriages; and
WHEREAS, The granting of same-sex marriages ultimately began again in California in 2013 following the United States Supreme Court decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, which restored the effect of a federal district court ruling that overturned Proposition 8 as unconstitutional; and
WHEREAS, It is only right that this state formally apologize for the enactment and enforcement of laws used to persecute and oppress LGBT individuals and their communities; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature apologizes for the enactment of past discriminatory laws and constitutional provisions that resulted in the persecution and oppression of LGBT individuals and their communities, and which forced them to live in fear of unjust prosecutions and public shaming. The Legislature apologizes for these acts and reaffirms its commitment to preserving the rights of all people; and be it further
Resolved, That even though the Legislature is apologizing for the previous laws enacted in California, the Legislature is committed to taking the steps needed to be a fully inclusive state and preserving the rights of all people. No apology can make up for the years of discrimination; and be it further
Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.