CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1332Introduced by Assembly Member BontaFebruary 22, 2019 An act to add Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, relating to local government. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1332, as introduced, Bonta. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.Existing law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police and security departments, from using money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified, and, subject certain to exceptions, proscribes other activities or conduct in connection with immigration enforcement by law enforcement agencies. Existing law requires, by October 1, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible for use by public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses, among others. Existing law requires, among others, all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy, or an equivalent policy. Existing law also requires law enforcement agencies to report to the Department of Justice annually regarding transfers of persons to immigration authorities and requires the Attorney General to publish guidance, audit criteria, and training recommendations regarding state and local law enforcement databases, for purposes of limiting the availability of information for immigration enforcement, as specified.This bill would enact the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act, which would, among other things, prohibit a city, county, or city and county from entering into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, as defined, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a city, county, or city and county from making any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP, as specified. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to initiate, and require the department to receive and investigate, all complaints regarding violations of these provisions, and would require the department to issue findings regarding any alleged violation and notify any affected city, county, or city and county. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, this bill would make a violation of these provisions subject to civil and criminal penalties, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:(a) President Trump issued an executive order on January 25, 2017, titled Border Security and Immigration Enforcement and created heightened fear and insecurity among many immigrant communities within this state and across the nation.(b) The state has a moral obligation to protect its residents from persecution.(c) Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the state.(d) California enacted Senate Bill 54 of the 201718 Regular Session (Chapter 495 of the Statutes of 2017), ensuring making this state a sanctuary state.(e) A registry of individuals identified by religion, national origin, or ethnicity, in a list, database, or registry, including that information, could be used by the government to persecute those individuals.(f) President Trump has repeatedly signaled that he intends to require Muslims to register in a database.(g) Trump advisors have invoked World War II Japanese American internment as a precedent for the proposed expansion of the registry.(h) The United States Census Bureau turned over confidential information in 1943, including names and addresses, to help the United States government identify Japanese Americans during World War II for the purpose of relocation.(i) President Trump has ordered a sweeping expansion of deportations and assigned unprecedented powers to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers targeting and terrorizing immigrant communities.(j) President Trump has issued three executive orders banning entry from certain Muslim-majority countries.(k) (1) ICEs Enforcement and Removal Operations issued a request for information on August 3, 2017, to obtain commercial subscription data services capable of providing continuous real-time information pertaining to 500,000 identities per month from sources such as state identification numbers, real-time jail booking data, credit history, insurance claims, phone number account information, wireless phone accounts, wire transfer data, drivers license information, vehicle registration information, property information, payday loan information, public court records, incarceration data, employment address data, individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) data, and employer records.(2) ICE has a $1,600,000 contract with Thomson-Reuters, maker of popular law firm software products such as Westlaw and PeopleMap, for the services referenced in paragraph (1) via its Consolidated Lead Evaluation and Reporting (CLEAR) software.(3) ICE has proposed a $13,600,000 four-year contract with Thomson-Reuters for continuing access to CLEAR that requires CLEAR to interface with Palantirs FALCON analytics, for the purposes of asset forfeiture investigations.(l) ICE has a $41,000,000 contract with Palantir Technologies for the development of an intelligence system called Investigative Case Management, intended to be capable of providing information pertaining to an individuals schooling, family relationships, employment information, phone records, immigration history, foreign exchange program status, personal connections, biometric traits, criminal records, and home and work addresses.(m) The United States Department of Homeland Security published a new rule on September 18, 2017, authorizing the collection of social media information on all immigrants, including permanent residents and naturalized citizens.(n) ICE has awarded Giant Oak with $3,000,000 for three separate contracts pertaining to social media data analytics services.(o) On September 8, 2017, ICE arrested hundreds of immigrants in intentionally targeted sanctuary cities.(p) ICEs Extreme Vetting Initiative industry day attracted large corporations like International Business Machines (IBM), LexisNexis, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Deloitte, Unisys, Booz Allen Hamilton, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Palantir in pursuit of contracts that would provide ICE with various data broker, social media threat modeling, and extreme vetting services.(q) On January 8, 2018, ICE awarded a contract to Vigilant to obtain access to Vigilants commercially available license plate reader database, for the purpose of enhancing ICEs ability to pursue civil immigration violations.(r) Microsofts $19,400,000 Azure Government contract with ICE is being used to utilize deep learning capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification, causing 300 Microsoft employees to threaten to resign in an open letter to the company.(s) IBM provided census tabulating card machines (Dehomag Hollerith D-11) and punch cards to Hitlers Third Reich, and custom-designed specialized applications at each major concentration camp throughout Germany and greater Europe enabling the Nazi Party to automate identification and persecution of Jews and others during the Holocaust. SEC. 2. Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) is added to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read: CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.(b) Data broker means both of the following:(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:(1) Information published by reliable sources.(2) Information released by public agencies.(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review. 7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter. 7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1332Introduced by Assembly Member BontaFebruary 22, 2019 An act to add Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, relating to local government. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1332, as introduced, Bonta. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.Existing law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police and security departments, from using money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified, and, subject certain to exceptions, proscribes other activities or conduct in connection with immigration enforcement by law enforcement agencies. Existing law requires, by October 1, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible for use by public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses, among others. Existing law requires, among others, all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy, or an equivalent policy. Existing law also requires law enforcement agencies to report to the Department of Justice annually regarding transfers of persons to immigration authorities and requires the Attorney General to publish guidance, audit criteria, and training recommendations regarding state and local law enforcement databases, for purposes of limiting the availability of information for immigration enforcement, as specified.This bill would enact the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act, which would, among other things, prohibit a city, county, or city and county from entering into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, as defined, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a city, county, or city and county from making any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP, as specified. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to initiate, and require the department to receive and investigate, all complaints regarding violations of these provisions, and would require the department to issue findings regarding any alleged violation and notify any affected city, county, or city and county. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, this bill would make a violation of these provisions subject to civil and criminal penalties, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill No. 1332
Introduced by Assembly Member BontaFebruary 22, 2019
Introduced by Assembly Member Bonta
February 22, 2019
An act to add Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, relating to local government.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1332, as introduced, Bonta. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.
Existing law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police and security departments, from using money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified, and, subject certain to exceptions, proscribes other activities or conduct in connection with immigration enforcement by law enforcement agencies. Existing law requires, by October 1, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible for use by public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses, among others. Existing law requires, among others, all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy, or an equivalent policy. Existing law also requires law enforcement agencies to report to the Department of Justice annually regarding transfers of persons to immigration authorities and requires the Attorney General to publish guidance, audit criteria, and training recommendations regarding state and local law enforcement databases, for purposes of limiting the availability of information for immigration enforcement, as specified.This bill would enact the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act, which would, among other things, prohibit a city, county, or city and county from entering into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, as defined, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a city, county, or city and county from making any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP, as specified. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to initiate, and require the department to receive and investigate, all complaints regarding violations of these provisions, and would require the department to issue findings regarding any alleged violation and notify any affected city, county, or city and county. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, this bill would make a violation of these provisions subject to civil and criminal penalties, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police and security departments, from using money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified, and, subject certain to exceptions, proscribes other activities or conduct in connection with immigration enforcement by law enforcement agencies. Existing law requires, by October 1, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible for use by public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses, among others. Existing law requires, among others, all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy, or an equivalent policy. Existing law also requires law enforcement agencies to report to the Department of Justice annually regarding transfers of persons to immigration authorities and requires the Attorney General to publish guidance, audit criteria, and training recommendations regarding state and local law enforcement databases, for purposes of limiting the availability of information for immigration enforcement, as specified.
This bill would enact the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act, which would, among other things, prohibit a city, county, or city and county from entering into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, as defined, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists, as specified. The bill would also prohibit a city, county, or city and county from making any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any provider of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP, as specified. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to initiate, and require the department to receive and investigate, all complaints regarding violations of these provisions, and would require the department to issue findings regarding any alleged violation and notify any affected city, county, or city and county. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, this bill would make a violation of these provisions subject to civil and criminal penalties, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
## Digest Key
## Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:(a) President Trump issued an executive order on January 25, 2017, titled Border Security and Immigration Enforcement and created heightened fear and insecurity among many immigrant communities within this state and across the nation.(b) The state has a moral obligation to protect its residents from persecution.(c) Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the state.(d) California enacted Senate Bill 54 of the 201718 Regular Session (Chapter 495 of the Statutes of 2017), ensuring making this state a sanctuary state.(e) A registry of individuals identified by religion, national origin, or ethnicity, in a list, database, or registry, including that information, could be used by the government to persecute those individuals.(f) President Trump has repeatedly signaled that he intends to require Muslims to register in a database.(g) Trump advisors have invoked World War II Japanese American internment as a precedent for the proposed expansion of the registry.(h) The United States Census Bureau turned over confidential information in 1943, including names and addresses, to help the United States government identify Japanese Americans during World War II for the purpose of relocation.(i) President Trump has ordered a sweeping expansion of deportations and assigned unprecedented powers to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers targeting and terrorizing immigrant communities.(j) President Trump has issued three executive orders banning entry from certain Muslim-majority countries.(k) (1) ICEs Enforcement and Removal Operations issued a request for information on August 3, 2017, to obtain commercial subscription data services capable of providing continuous real-time information pertaining to 500,000 identities per month from sources such as state identification numbers, real-time jail booking data, credit history, insurance claims, phone number account information, wireless phone accounts, wire transfer data, drivers license information, vehicle registration information, property information, payday loan information, public court records, incarceration data, employment address data, individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) data, and employer records.(2) ICE has a $1,600,000 contract with Thomson-Reuters, maker of popular law firm software products such as Westlaw and PeopleMap, for the services referenced in paragraph (1) via its Consolidated Lead Evaluation and Reporting (CLEAR) software.(3) ICE has proposed a $13,600,000 four-year contract with Thomson-Reuters for continuing access to CLEAR that requires CLEAR to interface with Palantirs FALCON analytics, for the purposes of asset forfeiture investigations.(l) ICE has a $41,000,000 contract with Palantir Technologies for the development of an intelligence system called Investigative Case Management, intended to be capable of providing information pertaining to an individuals schooling, family relationships, employment information, phone records, immigration history, foreign exchange program status, personal connections, biometric traits, criminal records, and home and work addresses.(m) The United States Department of Homeland Security published a new rule on September 18, 2017, authorizing the collection of social media information on all immigrants, including permanent residents and naturalized citizens.(n) ICE has awarded Giant Oak with $3,000,000 for three separate contracts pertaining to social media data analytics services.(o) On September 8, 2017, ICE arrested hundreds of immigrants in intentionally targeted sanctuary cities.(p) ICEs Extreme Vetting Initiative industry day attracted large corporations like International Business Machines (IBM), LexisNexis, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Deloitte, Unisys, Booz Allen Hamilton, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Palantir in pursuit of contracts that would provide ICE with various data broker, social media threat modeling, and extreme vetting services.(q) On January 8, 2018, ICE awarded a contract to Vigilant to obtain access to Vigilants commercially available license plate reader database, for the purpose of enhancing ICEs ability to pursue civil immigration violations.(r) Microsofts $19,400,000 Azure Government contract with ICE is being used to utilize deep learning capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification, causing 300 Microsoft employees to threaten to resign in an open letter to the company.(s) IBM provided census tabulating card machines (Dehomag Hollerith D-11) and punch cards to Hitlers Third Reich, and custom-designed specialized applications at each major concentration camp throughout Germany and greater Europe enabling the Nazi Party to automate identification and persecution of Jews and others during the Holocaust. SEC. 2. Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) is added to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read: CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.(b) Data broker means both of the following:(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:(1) Information published by reliable sources.(2) Information released by public agencies.(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review. 7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter. 7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:(a) President Trump issued an executive order on January 25, 2017, titled Border Security and Immigration Enforcement and created heightened fear and insecurity among many immigrant communities within this state and across the nation.(b) The state has a moral obligation to protect its residents from persecution.(c) Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the state.(d) California enacted Senate Bill 54 of the 201718 Regular Session (Chapter 495 of the Statutes of 2017), ensuring making this state a sanctuary state.(e) A registry of individuals identified by religion, national origin, or ethnicity, in a list, database, or registry, including that information, could be used by the government to persecute those individuals.(f) President Trump has repeatedly signaled that he intends to require Muslims to register in a database.(g) Trump advisors have invoked World War II Japanese American internment as a precedent for the proposed expansion of the registry.(h) The United States Census Bureau turned over confidential information in 1943, including names and addresses, to help the United States government identify Japanese Americans during World War II for the purpose of relocation.(i) President Trump has ordered a sweeping expansion of deportations and assigned unprecedented powers to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers targeting and terrorizing immigrant communities.(j) President Trump has issued three executive orders banning entry from certain Muslim-majority countries.(k) (1) ICEs Enforcement and Removal Operations issued a request for information on August 3, 2017, to obtain commercial subscription data services capable of providing continuous real-time information pertaining to 500,000 identities per month from sources such as state identification numbers, real-time jail booking data, credit history, insurance claims, phone number account information, wireless phone accounts, wire transfer data, drivers license information, vehicle registration information, property information, payday loan information, public court records, incarceration data, employment address data, individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) data, and employer records.(2) ICE has a $1,600,000 contract with Thomson-Reuters, maker of popular law firm software products such as Westlaw and PeopleMap, for the services referenced in paragraph (1) via its Consolidated Lead Evaluation and Reporting (CLEAR) software.(3) ICE has proposed a $13,600,000 four-year contract with Thomson-Reuters for continuing access to CLEAR that requires CLEAR to interface with Palantirs FALCON analytics, for the purposes of asset forfeiture investigations.(l) ICE has a $41,000,000 contract with Palantir Technologies for the development of an intelligence system called Investigative Case Management, intended to be capable of providing information pertaining to an individuals schooling, family relationships, employment information, phone records, immigration history, foreign exchange program status, personal connections, biometric traits, criminal records, and home and work addresses.(m) The United States Department of Homeland Security published a new rule on September 18, 2017, authorizing the collection of social media information on all immigrants, including permanent residents and naturalized citizens.(n) ICE has awarded Giant Oak with $3,000,000 for three separate contracts pertaining to social media data analytics services.(o) On September 8, 2017, ICE arrested hundreds of immigrants in intentionally targeted sanctuary cities.(p) ICEs Extreme Vetting Initiative industry day attracted large corporations like International Business Machines (IBM), LexisNexis, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Deloitte, Unisys, Booz Allen Hamilton, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Palantir in pursuit of contracts that would provide ICE with various data broker, social media threat modeling, and extreme vetting services.(q) On January 8, 2018, ICE awarded a contract to Vigilant to obtain access to Vigilants commercially available license plate reader database, for the purpose of enhancing ICEs ability to pursue civil immigration violations.(r) Microsofts $19,400,000 Azure Government contract with ICE is being used to utilize deep learning capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification, causing 300 Microsoft employees to threaten to resign in an open letter to the company.(s) IBM provided census tabulating card machines (Dehomag Hollerith D-11) and punch cards to Hitlers Third Reich, and custom-designed specialized applications at each major concentration camp throughout Germany and greater Europe enabling the Nazi Party to automate identification and persecution of Jews and others during the Holocaust.
SECTION 1. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:(a) President Trump issued an executive order on January 25, 2017, titled Border Security and Immigration Enforcement and created heightened fear and insecurity among many immigrant communities within this state and across the nation.(b) The state has a moral obligation to protect its residents from persecution.(c) Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the state.(d) California enacted Senate Bill 54 of the 201718 Regular Session (Chapter 495 of the Statutes of 2017), ensuring making this state a sanctuary state.(e) A registry of individuals identified by religion, national origin, or ethnicity, in a list, database, or registry, including that information, could be used by the government to persecute those individuals.(f) President Trump has repeatedly signaled that he intends to require Muslims to register in a database.(g) Trump advisors have invoked World War II Japanese American internment as a precedent for the proposed expansion of the registry.(h) The United States Census Bureau turned over confidential information in 1943, including names and addresses, to help the United States government identify Japanese Americans during World War II for the purpose of relocation.(i) President Trump has ordered a sweeping expansion of deportations and assigned unprecedented powers to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers targeting and terrorizing immigrant communities.(j) President Trump has issued three executive orders banning entry from certain Muslim-majority countries.(k) (1) ICEs Enforcement and Removal Operations issued a request for information on August 3, 2017, to obtain commercial subscription data services capable of providing continuous real-time information pertaining to 500,000 identities per month from sources such as state identification numbers, real-time jail booking data, credit history, insurance claims, phone number account information, wireless phone accounts, wire transfer data, drivers license information, vehicle registration information, property information, payday loan information, public court records, incarceration data, employment address data, individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) data, and employer records.(2) ICE has a $1,600,000 contract with Thomson-Reuters, maker of popular law firm software products such as Westlaw and PeopleMap, for the services referenced in paragraph (1) via its Consolidated Lead Evaluation and Reporting (CLEAR) software.(3) ICE has proposed a $13,600,000 four-year contract with Thomson-Reuters for continuing access to CLEAR that requires CLEAR to interface with Palantirs FALCON analytics, for the purposes of asset forfeiture investigations.(l) ICE has a $41,000,000 contract with Palantir Technologies for the development of an intelligence system called Investigative Case Management, intended to be capable of providing information pertaining to an individuals schooling, family relationships, employment information, phone records, immigration history, foreign exchange program status, personal connections, biometric traits, criminal records, and home and work addresses.(m) The United States Department of Homeland Security published a new rule on September 18, 2017, authorizing the collection of social media information on all immigrants, including permanent residents and naturalized citizens.(n) ICE has awarded Giant Oak with $3,000,000 for three separate contracts pertaining to social media data analytics services.(o) On September 8, 2017, ICE arrested hundreds of immigrants in intentionally targeted sanctuary cities.(p) ICEs Extreme Vetting Initiative industry day attracted large corporations like International Business Machines (IBM), LexisNexis, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Deloitte, Unisys, Booz Allen Hamilton, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Palantir in pursuit of contracts that would provide ICE with various data broker, social media threat modeling, and extreme vetting services.(q) On January 8, 2018, ICE awarded a contract to Vigilant to obtain access to Vigilants commercially available license plate reader database, for the purpose of enhancing ICEs ability to pursue civil immigration violations.(r) Microsofts $19,400,000 Azure Government contract with ICE is being used to utilize deep learning capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification, causing 300 Microsoft employees to threaten to resign in an open letter to the company.(s) IBM provided census tabulating card machines (Dehomag Hollerith D-11) and punch cards to Hitlers Third Reich, and custom-designed specialized applications at each major concentration camp throughout Germany and greater Europe enabling the Nazi Party to automate identification and persecution of Jews and others during the Holocaust.
SECTION 1. The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:
### SECTION 1.
(a) President Trump issued an executive order on January 25, 2017, titled Border Security and Immigration Enforcement and created heightened fear and insecurity among many immigrant communities within this state and across the nation.
(b) The state has a moral obligation to protect its residents from persecution.
(c) Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the state.
(d) California enacted Senate Bill 54 of the 201718 Regular Session (Chapter 495 of the Statutes of 2017), ensuring making this state a sanctuary state.
(e) A registry of individuals identified by religion, national origin, or ethnicity, in a list, database, or registry, including that information, could be used by the government to persecute those individuals.
(f) President Trump has repeatedly signaled that he intends to require Muslims to register in a database.
(g) Trump advisors have invoked World War II Japanese American internment as a precedent for the proposed expansion of the registry.
(h) The United States Census Bureau turned over confidential information in 1943, including names and addresses, to help the United States government identify Japanese Americans during World War II for the purpose of relocation.
(i) President Trump has ordered a sweeping expansion of deportations and assigned unprecedented powers to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers targeting and terrorizing immigrant communities.
(j) President Trump has issued three executive orders banning entry from certain Muslim-majority countries.
(k) (1) ICEs Enforcement and Removal Operations issued a request for information on August 3, 2017, to obtain commercial subscription data services capable of providing continuous real-time information pertaining to 500,000 identities per month from sources such as state identification numbers, real-time jail booking data, credit history, insurance claims, phone number account information, wireless phone accounts, wire transfer data, drivers license information, vehicle registration information, property information, payday loan information, public court records, incarceration data, employment address data, individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) data, and employer records.
(2) ICE has a $1,600,000 contract with Thomson-Reuters, maker of popular law firm software products such as Westlaw and PeopleMap, for the services referenced in paragraph (1) via its Consolidated Lead Evaluation and Reporting (CLEAR) software.
(3) ICE has proposed a $13,600,000 four-year contract with Thomson-Reuters for continuing access to CLEAR that requires CLEAR to interface with Palantirs FALCON analytics, for the purposes of asset forfeiture investigations.
(l) ICE has a $41,000,000 contract with Palantir Technologies for the development of an intelligence system called Investigative Case Management, intended to be capable of providing information pertaining to an individuals schooling, family relationships, employment information, phone records, immigration history, foreign exchange program status, personal connections, biometric traits, criminal records, and home and work addresses.
(m) The United States Department of Homeland Security published a new rule on September 18, 2017, authorizing the collection of social media information on all immigrants, including permanent residents and naturalized citizens.
(n) ICE has awarded Giant Oak with $3,000,000 for three separate contracts pertaining to social media data analytics services.
(o) On September 8, 2017, ICE arrested hundreds of immigrants in intentionally targeted sanctuary cities.
(p) ICEs Extreme Vetting Initiative industry day attracted large corporations like International Business Machines (IBM), LexisNexis, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Deloitte, Unisys, Booz Allen Hamilton, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Palantir in pursuit of contracts that would provide ICE with various data broker, social media threat modeling, and extreme vetting services.
(q) On January 8, 2018, ICE awarded a contract to Vigilant to obtain access to Vigilants commercially available license plate reader database, for the purpose of enhancing ICEs ability to pursue civil immigration violations.
(r) Microsofts $19,400,000 Azure Government contract with ICE is being used to utilize deep learning capabilities to accelerate facial recognition and identification, causing 300 Microsoft employees to threaten to resign in an open letter to the company.
(s) IBM provided census tabulating card machines (Dehomag Hollerith D-11) and punch cards to Hitlers Third Reich, and custom-designed specialized applications at each major concentration camp throughout Germany and greater Europe enabling the Nazi Party to automate identification and persecution of Jews and others during the Holocaust.
SEC. 2. Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) is added to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read: CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.(b) Data broker means both of the following:(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:(1) Information published by reliable sources.(2) Information released by public agencies.(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review. 7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter. 7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 2. Chapter 17.23 (commencing with Section 7283.50) is added to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read:
### SEC. 2.
CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.(b) Data broker means both of the following:(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:(1) Information published by reliable sources.(2) Information released by public agencies.(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review. 7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter. 7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.(b) Data broker means both of the following:(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:(1) Information published by reliable sources.(2) Information released by public agencies.(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review. 7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter. 7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act
CHAPTER 17.23. Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act
7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.
7283.50. This chapter shall be known as the Sanctuary State Contracting and Investment Act.
7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.(b) Data broker means both of the following:(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.
7283.51. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:
(a) CBP means United States Customs and Border Protection.
(b) Data broker means both of the following:
(1) The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling that information to their customers, which include both private sector businesses and government agencies.
(2) The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose different from that for which it is ultimately used.
(c) Detention facilities means any private party that provides transportation, identification, processing, security, maintenance, or other operational support to a private or public facility intended or actually used for immigration detention purposes.
(d) Extreme vetting means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar service.
(e) ICE means United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
(f) Person or entity means any private natural person, any corporation, institution, subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that person, any parent entity that has operating control over that person, and any subsidiary, affiliate, or division under operating control of that parent entity. Person or entity does not include any government entity or government employee.
7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:(1) Information published by reliable sources.(2) Information released by public agencies.(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review.
7283.52. (a) (1) A city, county, or city and county shall not enter into a new, amended, or extended contract or agreement with any person or entity that provides ICE or CBP with any data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, unless the city, county, or city and county has made a finding that no reasonable alternative exists. The findings made shall take all of the following into consideration:
(A) The intent and purpose of this chapter.
(B) The availability of alternative services, goods, and equipment.
(C) Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.
(2) All public works, construction bids, requests for information, requests for proposals, or any other solicitation issued by the city, county, or city and county shall include notice of the prohibition in paragraph (1).
(b) For the purpose of determining which person or entity provides ICE or CBP with data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services, the city, county, or city and county shall consider all of the following:
(1) Information published by reliable sources.
(2) Information released by public agencies.
(3) A declaration under the penalty of perjury executed by the person or entity, affirming that they do not provide data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.
(4) Information submitted to the city, county, or city and county by any member of the public, and thereafter duly verified.
(c) The city, county, or city and county shall notify any person or entity identified as a supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP of the determination. Any person or entity shall be entitled to a review of the determination by appeal to the city, county, or city and county. Request for review shall be made within 30 days of notification, or seven days of the date of the solicitation or notice of a pending contract or purchase, of interest to the person or entity seeking review.
7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter.
7283.53. (a) A city, county, or city and county shall not make any investment in stocks, bonds, securities, or other obligations issued by any supplier of data broker, extreme vetting, or detention facilities services to ICE or CBP.
(b) A city, county, or city and county shall adopt a plan, or amend any existing plan, with respect to pension fund investments that complies with this chapter.
7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.
7283.54. (a) (1) The Department of Justice may initiate and shall receive and investigate all complaints regarding violations of this chapter. After investigating a complaint received pursuant to this paragraph, the department shall issue findings regarding any alleged violation. If the department finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, the department shall, within 30 days of making the finding, notify the city, county, or city and county of the violation.
(2) The city, county, or city and county shall cooperate with the department in any investigation of a violation of this chapter.
(b) The city, county, or city and county shall remedy any violation of this chapter upon becoming aware of the violation, and shall utilize all legal measures available to rescind, terminate, or void a contract awarded in violation of this chapter.
(c) On or before April 1, 2002, and annually thereafter, each city, county, or city and county shall certify its compliance with this chapter by posting a report on its Internet Web site. At minimum, this report shall do all of the following:
(1) Detail with specificity the steps taken to ensure compliance with this chapter.
(2) Disclose any issues with compliance, including any violations or potential violations of this chapter
(3) Detail actions taken to cure any deficiencies with compliance.
7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).
7283.55. (a) A violation of this chapter constitutes an injury. Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this chapter.
(b) If a city, county, or city and county is found liable in a cause of action brought by an individual pursuant to subdivision (a), the city, county, or city and county shall be liable for both of the following:
(1) The damages suffered by the plaintiff, if any, as determined by the court.
(2) (A) A civil penalty no greater than five thousand dollars ($5,000) per violation, as determined by the court.
(B) In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the court shall consider whether the violation was intentional or negligent, and any other prior violations of this ordinance by the city, county, or city and county that committed the violation.
(c) A court shall award a plaintiff who prevails on a cause of action under subdivision (a) reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
(d) Any person bringing an action pursuant to this section shall first file a claim with the city, county, or city and county pursuant to Section 905 of the Government Code or any successor statute within four years of the alleged violation.
(e) Any person or entity knowingly or willingly supplying false information in violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 7283.52 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000).
7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.
7283.56. The provisions of this chapter are to be construed broadly to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.
7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
7283.57. The provisions of this chapter are severable. If any provision of this chapter or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
### SEC. 3.
However, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.