California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1798

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  

Caption

California Racial Justice Act: death penalty.

Impact

This bill significantly impacts local courts and prosecutors by requiring them to account for potential racial bias in capital cases. It mandates that a defendant can provide evidence, such as statistical data or testimonies from various stakeholders in the criminal justice system, to demonstrate that race influenced the death penalty decision-making process. Additionally, this introduces a statewide framework for evaluating racial discrimination in judicial practices, which can lead to broader reform efforts in the California legal landscape.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1798, known as the California Racial Justice Act, is designed to address racial biases in the application of the death penalty. The bill prohibits the imposition of the death sentence if it is determined that race played a significant role in the decision to seek or impose such a sentence. Through this act, the bill aims to ensure that evidence of racial discrimination is taken into consideration during capital trials, offering a path for defendants to challenge death sentences based on these findings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1798 reflects a growing concern for racial equity within the justice system. Advocates for the bill view it as an essential step towards rectifying historical injustices and addressing systemic racism in capital punishment. Conversely, critics argue that the bill could complicate legal proceedings and potentially lead to unjust outcomes if not effectively implemented. This dichotomy illustrates the challenges in addressing the intersection of race and legal authority in a highly polarized societal context.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to AB 1798 include the implications of requiring courts to assess racial bias in death penalty cases. Proponents assert that the bill will enhance fairness and accountability, while opponents fear it may create a burden on the judicial system and could be exploited in appeals. Ultimately, this legislation brings to light the need for discussions around the ethics of capital punishment and the importance of ensuring justice is administered without prejudice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB80

Coastal resources: ocean research: West Coast Offshore Wind Science Entity.

CA AB1407

Coastal resources: ocean recovery and restoration: large-scale restoration: artificial reefs.

CA SB1249

Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.

CA SB410

Powering Up Californians Act.

CA AB2636

Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.

CA SB1324

California Ocean Science Trust: agreements.

CA AB1961

End Hunger in California Act of 2024.

CA SB704

Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: industrial developments: oil and gas developments: refineries: petrochemical facilities: offshore wind.

CA SB659

California Water Supply Solutions Act of 2023.

CA AB1771

California Emergency Services Act: State Emergency Plan: extreme heat preparedness and response plan.

Similar Bills

CA AB2542

Criminal procedure: discrimination.

CA AB1118

Criminal procedure: discrimination.

CA SB734

Criminal procedure: discrimination.

CA AB1115

Peace officers: mental health liaisons.

CA SB215

Diversion: mental disorders.

CA AB1272

California Environmental Quality Act: projects for the development of new housing units.

CA AB1071

Criminal procedure: discrimination.

CA AB3297

California Environmental Quality Act: projects for the development of new housing units: judicial review.