California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2140

Introduced
2/15/22  
Introduced
2/15/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Refer
4/26/22  
Refer
4/26/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/11/22  

Caption

Once-through cooling policy: powerplants.

Impact

The bill directly influences state laws regarding environmental standards for energy production. By enforcing restrictions on extensions for compliance with the once-through cooling policy, AB 2140 seeks to permanently transition away from practices deemed harmful to local marine life. The legislation builds upon previous findings by the State Water Resources Control Board, which recognized the adverse effects of once-through cooling methods, emphasizing the need for alternative cooling systems and energy sources.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2140, introduced by Assembly Member Muratsuchi, focuses on the once-through cooling policy which governs the operation of power plants that utilize ocean water for cooling. This bill prohibits the State Water Resources Control Board from granting extensions for compliance with this policy if the local city or county has formally objected and an advisory committee supports the objection based on statewide electricity reliability. The bill aims to phase out these powerplants, highlighting the need for environmental protection and the impact of cooling methods on marine ecosystems.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2140 tends to lean towards environmental preservation and sustainability. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a necessary commitment to protecting California's coastal ecosystems from the detrimental effects of outdated cooling practices. However, there are concerns from stakeholders within the energy sector regarding the implications of ceasing operations of certain power plants without clear alternatives for energy supply, leading to debates over reliability and energy security.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between regulatory measures and energy reliability. Critics argue that while the environmental goals are laudable, the abrupt cessation of operations for these power plants without adequate alternative energy solutions could pose challenges for electricity supply. The ongoing dialogues reflect the larger conversation around energy transition, local government authority, and the California state’s ambition for environmentally sustainable growth.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1298

Certification of thermal powerplants: data centers.

CA AB2495

Electricity: state policy: joint report.

CA AB2329

Energy: California Affordable Decarbonization Authority.

CA SB1003

Electricity: wildfire mitigation.

CA SB1140

Enhanced infrastructure financing district.

CA AB965

Local government: broadband permit applications.

CA AB123

Energy.

CA SB284

Electricity: energization transparency and efficiency: wholesale distribution service.

CA AB2778

Mobilehome Affordability Act: mobilehome parks: rent caps.

CA AB3068

Adaptive reuse: streamlining: incentives.

Similar Bills

CA AB2952

California Department of Community Living.

CA AB2325

Coordinated homelessness response: Office of the Interagency Council on Homelessness.

CA AB38

Fire safety: low-cost retrofits: regional capacity review: wildfire mitigation.

CA AB1088

Multifamily residential housing: energy programs.

CA AB1661

School accountability: federal compliance with accountability requirements.

CA AB1136

California Department of Community Living.

CA AB1377

Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention Program.

CA AB99

School safety: crisis intervention and targeted violence prevention program.