California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1126

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Engrossed
4/17/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Report Pass
8/21/23  
Report Pass
8/21/23  
Refer
8/21/23  
Refer
8/21/23  
Enrolled
9/12/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Passed
10/8/23  

Caption

Cannabis: citation and fine.

Impact

The enactment of AB 1126 will increase the regulatory framework surrounding the cannabis industry, particularly the requirements concerning record-keeping and product labeling. By defining the universal symbol as contraband if possessed improperly, the bill expands enforcement mechanisms for cannabis regulation and potentially heightens penalties for violations. This affects not only commercial cannabis operators but also local law enforcement and regulatory agencies, creating a more stringent environment for compliance.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1126, introduced by Lackey, modifies regulations related to cannabis by adding provisions to the Business and Professions Code and amending the Revenue and Taxation Code. This legislation establishes that the possession and use of a universal symbol associated with cannabis products in a commercial context can constitute various violations. Each individual item bearing this symbol is treated as a separate violation, which requires the possessor to maintain records proving their compliance with licensed commercial cannabis activities. Violations may lead to significant fines and contraband designations for noncompliant packaging and products.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1126 is mixed among stakeholders. Supporters argue that it strengthens regulatory integrity and ensures proper documentation within the growing cannabis market, which is essential for public safety and compliance. Conversely, detractors express concerns about the potential overreach of regulations, fearing that these stringent measures could place undue burdens on licensed operators, and could create complexities in navigating compliance due to the meticulous documentation requirements.

Contention

One of the primary points of contention in this bill stems from the expanded authority granted to peace officers and regulatory employees to conduct inspections at cannabis-related locations. Critics argue that such measures may lead to excessive scrutiny and deter businesses from fully operating within the legal cannabis framework. Additionally, the policy on treating labeled products as contraband raises issues about the practicality of enforcement and the bureaucratic challenges it may impose on businesses striving to adhere to compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB758

Cannabis.

CA AB97

Cannabis.

CA AB1417

Cannabis advertisement and marketing.

CA AB8

Cannabis: cannabinoids: industrial hemp.

CA AB2255

Cannabis: distribution: deliveries: violations.

CA AB195

Cannabis.

CA SB195

Cannabis.

CA SB97

Education finance: apportionments.

CA AB1448

Cannabis: enforcement by local jurisdictions.

CA SB94

Cannabis: medicinal and adult use.

Similar Bills

CA AB8

Cannabis: cannabinoids: industrial hemp.

CA AB2223

Cannabis: industrial hemp.

CA SB1498

Cannabis and industrial hemp: advertising: civil action.

CA AB743

California Financing Law: lawsuit financiers.

CA AB2546

Commercial email advertisements.

CA SB1482

Commercial financing.

CA SB430

Tied-house exceptions: advertising: common parent company.

CA SB888

Political Reform Act of 1974.