California Assembly Bill AB411

California 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report Pass: 3/16/23
• Refer: 3/20/23
• Report Pass: 4/19/23
• Refer: 5/10/23
• Refer: 4/19/23
• Failed: 2/1/24

Caption

California Recreational Trails and Greenways Act.

Impact

If passed, AB 411 will significantly impact state funding for environmental enhancements linked to transportation infrastructure. By broadening the scope of eligible projects and increasing financial resources allocated for these purposes, the bill aims to improve overall public access to recreational areas in California. The establishment of the California Recreational Trails and Greenways Program under the bill will provide competitive biennial grants for nonmotorized trails, thereby promoting active transportation alternatives and supporting community access to nature.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 411, introduced by Assembly Member Bennett, seeks to amend existing transportation laws in California to enhance funding for environmental projects related to recreational trails. The bill proposes an increase in the annual allocation from $7 million to $10 million for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program Fund, which will support local, state, and nonprofit initiatives aimed at trail enhancement and environmental mitigation. This includes funding for projects such as converting rail corridors to trails, improving pedestrian and cyclist safety at rail crossings, and developing natural surface trails.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 411 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for outdoor recreation and environmental stewardship. Supporters argue that enhancing trail systems is crucial for both public health and environmental sustainability, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic’s increased emphasis on outdoor activities. However, there may be some contention regarding funding allocations, particularly in ensuring equitable distribution to disadvantaged communities, which the bill specifies must receive at least 35% of the allocated funds.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise over the bill's focus on nonmotorized trail improvements versus motorized trail benefits. The bill restricts the allocation of federal moneys for motorized trail advantages to a maximum of $1.7 million, which could be a discussion point among various stakeholders with differing views on trail usage. Moreover, ensuring that the intended funds effectively reach projects across diverse communities—especially those historically marginalized—will require careful oversight and collaboration among state agencies and local governments.