California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB711

Introduced
2/14/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Engrossed
5/15/25  
Refer
5/15/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  

Caption

Civil Actions: shorthand reporters.

Impact

The legislation aims to streamline court procedures by ensuring that the process of hiring shorthand reporters becomes more transparent and standardized. By mandating notification about discussions related to retaining shorthand reporters, the bill enhances the organization of civil proceedings. The introduction of electronic communication as an acceptable method for discussions aims to make compliance easier and more efficient, particularly in an era where digital communication is prevalent. This reflects a broader trend towards modernization in legal practices to keep pace with technological advancements.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 711, also known as AB711, amends Section 2016.040 of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning civil actions. The bill introduces a requirement that the meet and confer notices, which are necessary for supporting various motions, must specify that the parties have discussed the retention of a certified shorthand reporter for the hearing on the motion. The amendment also allows for these discussions to take place through electronic communications, thus modernizing the approach to procedural requirements in legal settings.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB711 appears to be positive, as it seeks to enhance efficiency in the legal system. Supporters of the bill appreciate its alignment with technological progress and believe that clearer requirements can lead to better management of court resources. However, there may be concerns from some legal practitioners about the additional requirements and whether they could slow down the process rather than expedite it. As the legal community adapts, feedback from practitioners will be vital to gauge the long-term impacts of this change.

Contention

While the bill is generally viewed as a supportive measure for better organization in civil law, some critics might argue about the practicality of enforcing these procedures, especially in less technologically inclined settings. There may also be discussions regarding the implications for smaller legal practices that might not have ready access to shorthand reporters or efficient electronic communication platforms. Stakeholder feedback after implementation will be essential to address any potential challenges the provisions might bring.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB3252

Shorthand court reporters: sunset: certification.

CA SB662

Courts: court reporters.

CA AB2283

Civil actions: electronic service.

CA AB1755

Civil actions: restitution for or replacement of a new motor vehicle.

CA AB2837

Civil actions: enforcement of money judgments.

CA SB393

Civil actions: housing development projects.

CA SB727

Human trafficking: civil actions.

CA SB235

Civil discovery.

CA SB558

Civil actions: childhood sexual abuse.

CA AB561

Civil actions: service of process.

Similar Bills

CA SB554

Restraining orders.

CA AB383

Civil actions: discovery status conference.

CA AB2230

Civil actions.

TX SB1538

Relating to a study on digital court reporting conducted by the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System.

TX SB2094

Relating to court reporters and shorthand reporting firms; imposing a fee; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB1619

Relating to court reporters and shorthand reporting firms; imposing a fee; creating a criminal offense.

CA SB662

Courts: court reporters.

CA SB241

Civil actions.