Colorado 2024 2024 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1350 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/08/2024

                    Page 1 
March 8, 2024  HB 24-1350 
 
 
 Legislative Council Staff 
Nonpartisan Services for Colorado’s Legislature 
 
Fiscal Note  
  
 
Drafting Number: 
Prime Sponsors: 
LLS 24-0326  
Rep. Froelich; Story 
Sen. Winter F.  
Date: 
Bill Status: 
Fiscal Analyst: 
March 8, 2024 
House Judiciary  
Aaron Carpenter | 303-866-4918 
aaron.carpenter@coleg.gov  
Bill Topic: PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES PROCEEDINGS CHILD SAFETY  
Summary of  
Fiscal Impact: 
☐ State Revenue 
☒ State Expenditure 
☐ State Transfer 
☐ TABOR Refund 
☐ Local Government 
☐ Statutory Public Entity 
 
The bill makes several changes to family court proceedings. Starting in FY 2024-25, 
the bill increases state expenditures.  
Appropriation 
Summary: 
For FY 2024-25, the bill requires an appropriation of $249,049 to the Judicial 
Department 
Fiscal Note 
Status: 
The fiscal note reflects the introduced bill. 
Table 1 
State Fiscal Impacts Under HB 24-1350 
  
Budget Year 
FY 2024-25 
Out Year 
FY 2025-26 
Revenue 
 
-       	-       
Expenditures 	General Fund 	$249,049  $294,259  
 	Centrally Appropriated 	$44,304  $55,156  
 	Total Expenditures 	$293,353  $349,415  
 	Total FTE 	2.1 FTE 2.6 FTE 
Transfers  	-       	-       
Other Budget Impacts General Fund Reserve 	$37,357  $44,139  
 
 
   Page 2 
March 8, 2024  HB 24-1350 
 
 
Summary of Legislation 
The bill makes several changes to domestic relations court proceedings and requirements for 
court personnel, as described below. 
Child and family investigator requirements. The bill requires child and family investigators to 
adhere to national interviewing criteria and standards. Investigators must prepare a written 
report for the court to consider that includes options that serve the best interest of the child or 
youth, as well as all information acquired during the investigation concerning domestic violence 
and child abuse. Investigators are also required to provide written disclosures to each party 
describing their duties, compliance with training requirements, and information on filing a 
complaint about an investigator with the State Court Administrator.  
Domestic relations court proceedings. Children and youth in domestic relations cases who are 
of a sufficient age and maturity must be given the opportunity to express their opinion to the 
court and investigators during family court proceedings. The child must be allowed to express 
their views without being in the presence of their parent, if necessary. Courts must give strong 
consideration to a child’s preference in allocating parental responsibilities but must prioritize the 
physical, mental and emotional needs of the child. In addition, if the court orders unsupervised 
parenting time for parent accused of domestic violence, child abuse, or child sexual abuse, the 
court must justify why the decision is in the best interest of the child. Courts may cap fees paid 
to family investigators and allocate the responsibility for paying these fees. 
Parental alienation syndrome. The bill prohibits the consideration of parental alienation 
syndrome or other theories not supported by evidence-based and peer-reviewed research in 
written reports of child and family investigators, in determining the best interest of the child for 
purposes of parenting time, and in the training for child and family investigators, evaluators, and 
legal representatives of children.   
Coercive control and domestic violence training. The bill defines coercive control and 
requires training opportunities for recognizing coercive control for court personnel in domestic 
violence and child abuse cases, including for family investigators, evaluators and judges. Courts 
must consider evidence on coercive control in these cases.The bill requires training for child and 
family investigators, evaluators, and legal representatives of children to be culturally informed, 
and allows non-governmental professional trainers conduct the training.  
Reporting. The State Court Administrator must accept complaints against family investigators 
and evaluators. Annually, the Judicial Department must report these complaints and other family 
court metrics to the legislature during their SMART Act hearing. Finally, the Judicial Department 
must publish certain information on its website regarding family court proceedings, judges who 
have completed domestic violence and child abuse trainings, and actions.   
   Page 3 
March 8, 2024  HB 24-1350 
 
 
Assumptions 
According to the Judicial Department, there are an average of 9,570 domestic relations cases 
involving a child each year. The fiscal note assumes that in 10 percent of these cases, 
or 957 cases, a child or youth will choose to present their opinion to the court directly to the 
judge in chambers. The fiscal note assumes this process requires up to 45 minutes, which 
includes time to determine the maturity of the child and to conduct the interview. 
In addition, the Judicial Department reports that there are currently no programs available 
offering the required 20-hour training on domestic violence to family investigators and 
evaluators. The fiscal note assumes that the department is required to establish a training and 
that it will take one year to develop.  
State Expenditures 
The bill increases state expenditures in the Judicial Department by $293,000 in FY 2024-25 and 
$349,000 in FY 2025-26 and ongoing, as shown in Table 2 and described below. 
Table 2 
Expenditures Under HB 24-1350 
 	FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 
Judicial Department    
Personal Services 	$198,677  $249,221  
Operating Expenses 	$3,321  $4,238  
Capital Outlay Costs 	$47,052  $800  
Contract Training Facilitator 	- $40,000  
Centrally Appropriated Costs
1
 	$44,304  $55,156  
Total Cost $293,353  $349,415  
Total FTE 2.1 FTE 2.6 FTE 
1
 Centrally appropriated costs are not included in the bill's appropriation. 
 
Judicial Department. Starting in FY 2024-25, Judicial Department expenditures will increase to 
hire additional staff and to contract with a trainer, as described below. 
 Staff.  The Judicial Department requires 0.4 FTE for a magistrate to interview children and 
youth involved in domestic relations cases, 1.2 FTE for the magistrate’s supporting court 
staff, and 1.0 FTE for an educational specialist. Capital outlay and operating expenses are 
included and are prorated for a September 1, 2024, start date. Additional information is 
provided below.  
   Page 4 
March 8, 2024  HB 24-1350 
 
 
Trial Courts. Based on the assumptions outlined above, the trial courts require an additional 
0.4 FTE magistrate to hear child/youth testimony in domestic relations cases. Per Judicial 
Department common policies, each magistrate also receives support staff at a 3:1 ratio, 
resulting in an additional 1.2 FTE. Magistrates also require additional operating and capital 
outlay costs for robes, travel, law libraries, court room, and audio visual equipment. 
Operating and capital outlay costs for the magistrate are prorated to reflect 0.4 FTE, while 
support staff receive standard operating expenses and capital outlay.  
 
Office of the State Court Administrator. The department requires 1.0 FTE to develop update 
the 20-hour domestic violence and child abuse training with the requirements of the bill, 
collect and report the required data, and to provide administrative support to trainers.   
 
 Contract training facilitator. Starting in FY 2025-26, the Judicial Department requires 
$20,000 per training to contract with professional trainers. It is assumed trainings will occur 
twice a year, and costs include an online platform to host trainings virtually.  
 
 IT costs. Workload will increase for the department to update its case management system 
to collect the required data and post certain information about family court proceedings on 
the department website. No change in appropriations is required. 
 
 Centrally appropriated costs. Pursuant to a Joint Budget Committee policy, certain costs 
associated with this bill are addressed through the annual budget process and centrally 
appropriated in the Long Bill or supplemental appropriations bills, rather than in this bill.  
These costs, which include employee insurance and supplemental employee retirement 
payments, are shown in Table 2. 
Other Budget Impacts 
General Fund reserve. Under current law, an amount equal to 15 percent of General Fund 
appropriations must be set aside in the General Fund statutory reserve. Based on this fiscal note, 
the bill is expected to increase the amount of General Fund held in reserve by the amounts 
shown in Table 1, decreasing the amount of General Fund available for other purposes. 
Technical Note 
The bill’s timelines do not allow adequate time for the Judicial Department to develop and 
implement required training. Costs in the fiscal note assume the department will have one year 
to develop training.  
Effective Date 
The bill takes effect 90 days following adjournment of the General Assembly sine die, assuming 
no referendum petition is filed. 
   Page 5 
March 8, 2024  HB 24-1350 
 
 
State Appropriations 
For FY 2024-25, the bill requires a General Fund appropriation of $249,049to the Judicial 
Department, and 2.1 FTE. 
State and Local Government Contacts 
Counties      Human Services      Judicial  
 
 
The revenue and expenditure impacts in this fiscal note represent changes from current law under the bill for each 
fiscal year. For additional information about fiscal notes, please visit the General Assembly website.