Colorado House Bill HB1412

Colorado 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/25/24
• Report Pass: 3/27/24
• Refer: 3/25/24
• Engrossed: 4/1/24
• Refer: 3/27/24
• Report Pass: 4/3/24
• Refer: 4/1/24
• Engrossed: 4/11/24
• Refer: 4/3/24
• Engrossed: 4/12/24
• Passed: 4/18/24
• Enrolled: 4/12/24

Caption

Clarifications to Adjutant General's Powers

Impact

The impact of HB 1412 on state laws includes modifications to sections of Colorado Revised Statutes that govern the powers and duties of the Adjutant General. This bill will allow the Adjutant General to acquire and improve military facilities, subject to appropriations passed by the General Assembly. This authority aims to streamline the procurement process for properties and facilities essential for the National Guard, addressing the needs for operational efficiency and preparedness.

Summary

House Bill 1412 aims to clarify the powers of the Adjutant General regarding the disbursement of state funds for capital asset-related purposes. The bill enables the Adjutant General to manage and allocate state funds for necessary real property acquisitions and improvements that support the National Guard. By doing so, the legislation seeks to enhance the operational capabilities of the state’s military forces and ensure they have the facilities and resources needed to perform effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1412 is generally positive, especially among legislators who emphasize the importance of adequately funding and maintaining military resources. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a commitment to enhancing the state's military readiness and infrastructure. However, some discussion around the bill suggests a cautious approach to ensure transparency and oversight in the fund disbursement process, reflecting a balance between necessary military enhancements and fiscal responsibility.

Contention

While the bill primarily enjoys bipartisan support, there are concerns related to the implications of increased powers granted to the Adjutant General. Some proponents of caution argue that without proper frameworks for oversight, there may be risks related to the expenditures of state funds. The bill also includes provisions for the Capital Development Committee to review property acquisitions, which seeks to mitigate some of these concerns by ensuring a degree of legislative oversight before significant financial commitments are made.