Colorado 2025 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1265 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/26/2025

                    HB 25-1265  
Fiscal Note 
Legislative Council Staff 
Nonpartisan Services for Colorado’s Legislature 
HB 25-1265: MODIFY COUNTY COMMISSIONER ELECTIONS  
Prime Sponsors: 
Rep. Marshall 
Sen. Liston; Weissman  
Published for: House State Affairs  
Drafting number: LLS 25-0571  
Fiscal Analyst: 
Shukria Maktabi, 303-866-4720 
shukria.maktabi@coleg.gov  
Version: Initial Fiscal Note  
Date: February 25, 2025 
Fiscal note status: The fiscal note reflects the introduced bill. 
Summary Information 
Overview. The bill requires counties with populations of 250,000 or more to have five county 
commissioners and five districts.  
Types of impacts. The bill is projected to affect the following areas on an ongoing basis: 
 Local Government 
Appropriations. No appropriation is required. 
Table 1 
State Fiscal Impacts  
Type of Impact 
Budget Year 
FY 2025-26 
Out Year 
FY 2026-27 
State Revenue 	$0 	$0 
State Expenditures 	$0 	$0 
Transferred Funds  	$0 	$0 
Change in TABOR Refunds 	$0 	$0 
Change in State FTE 	0.0 FTE 	0.0 FTE 
   Page 2 
February 25, 2025  HB 25-1265 
 
Summary of Legislation 
The bill requires counties with populations of 250,000 or more to have five commissioners and 
five districts. The bill outlines three methods for electing the five required commissioners, as 
follows: 
 five commissioners voted by residents of five districts; 
 three commissioners voted by residents in three districts and two at-large commissioners; or  
 five at-large commissioners using proportional ranked voting method.  
By January 1, 2032, a board of county commissioners with only three commissioners in a county 
with a population greater than 250,000 must adopt a resolution to change their membership to 
five commissioners, and must refer a resolution to voters at the next general election to select a 
voting scenario to elect future commissioners. The requirements of the bill also apply to 
counties whose populations grow and exceed 250,000 in the future.  
Counties may change the method of electing members of a board of county commissioner via 
referendum or a petition signed by at least eight percent of voters submitted to the county clerk 
at least 90 days before the next general election. 
Background 
Currently, there are eight Colorado counties with a population greater than 250,000 people, not 
including Denver, which is a consolidated city and county. Of the eight counties, Adams, 
Arapahoe, El Paso, and Weld counties already have five commissioners. This bill impacts the 
remaining four counties that only have three commissioners: Boulder, Douglas, Jefferson, 
Larimer. 
Local Government 
Workload and costs for Boulder, Douglas, Jefferson, and Larimer counties will increase from 
adding two more commissioners, holding the required referendum to select the method of 
electing commissioners, and redistricting to create new commissioner districts. To the extent 
additional counties reach the 250,000 population threshold on or after January 1, 2032, costs will 
increase for those counties. It is assumed that counties would implement the changes and seat 
additional county commissioners no later than FY 2031-32. These impacts are discussed in more 
detail below. 
New Commissioners  
When the four counties add two additional commissioners, this will result in costs to each 
county of $350,000 or more annually for salaries and benefits for these commissioners. 
Additional costs for office space, computers, supplies, aides, support staff, and other expenses 
will also be incurred.   Page 3 
February 25, 2025  HB 25-1265 
 
Referendum 
Counties may have additional election costs to place the required referendum on a general 
election ballot by January 2032. It is assumed that counties already have county offices or ballot 
measures that will require participation in the coordinated election. To the extent this 
referendum is the sole county measure on the ballot, new costs will be incurred. If other county 
offices or ballot measures are on the ballot, adding one additional measure may impact the 
share of coordinated election costs paid by the county. For information purposes, large urban 
counties in past elections have had cost of around $700,000 to participate in coordinated 
elections.  
Redistricting  
If a county must establish new district boundaries following voter approval of the method for 
selecting commissioners, costs will increase for additional staff in election divisions, computer 
hardware, and software with geographic system information (GSI) and mapping capabilities, as 
well as associated costs to convene a redistricting commission. Costs include expenses for data 
gathering and analysis, community meetings, and ensuring newly drawn districts are fair; this 
can range from $75,000 to $135,000 per county.  
Petition Process 
The bill also creates a new countywide petition process that requires county clerks to approve 
petition formats, receive petitions, and review signatures to verify if the 8 percent threshold is 
met for future petitions seeking to change the voting method for county commissioners. This 
process can cost between $37,500 and $75,000 per county per ballot measure. 
Effective Date 
The bill takes effect 90 days following adjournment of the General Assembly sine die, assuming 
no referendum petition is filed. 
State and Local Government Contacts 
Counties 
County Clerks 
Local Affairs 
Secretary of State 
 
 
The revenue and expenditure impacts in this fiscal note represent changes from current law under the bill for each 
fiscal year. For additional information about fiscal notes, please visit the General Assembly website.