Connecticut House Bill HB05327

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/10
• Refer: 2/24/10
• Report Pass: 3/10/10
• Refer: 3/18/10
• Report Pass: 3/24/10
• Refer: 4/5/10
• Report Pass: 4/7/10
• Refer: 4/9/10

Caption

An Act Expanding Certain Reverse Auction Authority To The Purchase Of Certain Services By Municipalities, School Districts And State Agencies.

Impact

The proposed legislation will amend existing statutes to formally include reverse auctions as an acceptable method for awarding contracts by state agencies and local governments. Proponents argue that this approach will lead to more competitive pricing, as service providers may lower their bids in response to the auctions. Additionally, it has the potential to streamline the procurement process, making it easier for public agencies to obtain necessary services without excessive bureaucracy.

Summary

House Bill 5327 seeks to expand the authority of municipalities, school districts, and state agencies to utilize reverse auctions for the procurement of certain services. A reverse auction is a bidding process in which qualified bidders anonymously submit their proposals to provide goods or services. The bill aims to enhance competition and transparency in the procurement process, ensuring that state and local entities can obtain services in a more efficient manner, potentially leading to cost savings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5327 seems favorable among lawmakers looking for ways to innovate procurement methods and save taxpayer money. Supporters of the bill included members of both parties who believe that reverse auctions could significantly improve how public contracts are awarded. However, there could be some concerns about the potential for less oversight in the bidding process, as well as how effective these reverse auctions will be in practice, particularly in ensuring quality service.

Contention

While the general outlook on HB 5327 is positive, there may be contention about how the implementation of reverse auctions will be managed. Some stakeholders could worry about the adequacy of guidelines to maintain accountability and quality control when awarding contracts through this method. Concerns about transparency and ensuring that local firms have fair access to these competitive bidding opportunities might also arise during discussions around the bill.