Connecticut Senate Bill SB00167

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/10
• Refer: 2/16/10
• Report Pass: 3/9/10
• Report Pass: 3/22/10
• Refer: 3/30/10
• Report Pass: 4/7/10
• Refer: 4/14/10
• Report Pass: 4/19/10
• Report Pass: 4/21/10
• Refer: 4/27/10
• Report Pass: 4/29/10
• Engrossed: 5/1/10
• Report Pass: 5/1/10
• Chaptered: 5/12/10
• Enrolled: 5/17/10
• Passed: 5/18/10

Caption

An Act Concerning Indemnification Of Certain Police Officers.

Impact

The implications of SB00167 are significant for law enforcement and the legal liabilities they face. By providing a statutory framework for indemnification, the bill aims to protect officers from personal financial burden arising from legal proceedings linked to their official duties. This could potentially enhance officer morale and operational effectiveness, as they may feel more secure in performing their duties without fear of financial repercussions from unjust legal actions. Additionally, it represents a shift in how the state views and manages the legal liabilities of its police officers.

Summary

Senate Bill 00167, known as 'An Act Concerning Indemnification Of Certain Police Officers', seeks to indemnify police officers within specific governmental roles in cases where they face prosecution for actions taken while performing their official duties. The bill outlines that if an officer is acquitted or charges are dismissed, the employing governmental unit shall be responsible for covering economic losses, including attorney's fees and other associated costs. This measure is set to take effect on October 1, 2010, following its passage through the Senate.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00167 appears to be predominantly supportive among law enforcement circles, as it offers a layer of financial protection that many believe is necessary for police officers. However, concerns may arise from some quarters regarding the possibility of encouraging misconduct if officers feel shielded from the consequences of their actions. Overall, legislative discussions suggest a recognition of the challenges police face, balanced against accountability measures that remain necessary in the realm of law enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB00167 involve discussions about the balance between protecting police officers and ensuring accountability for their actions. Opponents might argue that indemnification could create a perception of immunity, potentially impacting public trust in law enforcement. Proponents, however, argue that the bill is essential for ensuring that officers can operate effectively without the threat of personal financial ruin should they face unfounded allegations. The ongoing dialogue reflects broader societal debates about the responsibilities and protections afforded to those in law enforcement.