Connecticut Senate Bill SB00415

Connecticut 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/10
• Refer: 3/4/10

Caption

An Act Revising The Membership Of The Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority Board And The Environmental Justice Statute.

Impact

One of the significant implications of this bill is its potential to enhance community involvement in environmental decisions. By mandating that developers articulate how they will facilitate public participation, the bill could lead to greater transparency and responsiveness in environmental governance. This shift is especially critical in areas identified as environmental justice communities, which may face disproportionate impacts from industrial developments. This bill intends to mitigate those impacts through enhanced local engagement and the negotiation of community environmental benefit agreements that address specific community needs.

Summary

Bill SB00415 aims to revise the structure and membership of the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority Board and strengthen the Environmental Justice Statute. It establishes more stringent requirements for public participation during the approval process of new or expanding facilities that might affect environmental justice communities. Specifically, applicants for permits must formulate and submit a 'meaningful public participation plan,' ensuring that local residents have substantial opportunities to engage in the decision-making process affecting their environment and health. This plan must be approved by relevant authorities before the application for a permit can be filed.

Contention

The main points of contention surrounding SB00415 stem from the balance between economic development and environmental protection. Some stakeholders argue that the increased participation requirements could slow down necessary developments, while others suggest that these regulations are essential for protecting vulnerable communities. Additionally, the requirements for public engagement might create complications for developers in terms of timelines and costs, potentially deterring investment in these communities. The perceived trade-offs between economic growth and environmental stewardship are pivotal in the ongoing discussions surrounding the bill.