Connecticut House Bill HB05080

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/6/11
• Refer: 1/6/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Eviction Proceedings With Respect To A Breach Of The Occupancy Limit In A Rental Agreement.

Impact

The passage of HB 5080 would significantly alter housing regulations by instituting a quicker eviction procedure for landlords faced with continuous violations of occupancy limits. This alteration is likely to affect numerous rental agreements and could potentially lead to an increase in evictions. Supporters of the bill suggest that it creates a necessary response to the challenges landlords face when dealing with tenants who do not comply with occupancy requirements. The proposed changes are expected to lead to more streamlined legal processes, thereby reducing the duration and complexity of eviction cases related to occupancy disputes.

Summary

House Bill 5080 addresses the process of eviction concerning breaches of occupancy limits in rental agreements. The bill is designed to streamline the eviction process for landlords when tenants violate the specified occupancy limits set in their rental contracts. By amending existing statutes, the legislation primarily aims to allow landlords to expedite evictions and remove not just tenants, but also unauthorized individuals residing with them, in cases of ongoing breaches. This legislative change reflects an effort to enhance the ability of landlords to manage their rental properties effectively when occupancy terms are not adhered to.

Contention

While the bill aims to simplify eviction proceedings for landlords, it raises concerns among tenant advocacy groups regarding the potential for misuse, leading to wrongful evictions. Critics argue that the expedited process might not provide adequate protections for tenants who may be unjustly accused of breaching occupancy limits, especially in cases involving larger families or temporary guests. There is ongoing debate about the balance between landlord rights and tenant protections, with some arguing that further safeguards are necessary to prevent abuse of the expedited eviction process.