Connecticut House Bill HB05683

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/11
• Refer: 1/21/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Delays In The Evaluation And Determination Process For Children Suspected Of Requiring Special Education Services.

Impact

If passed, the bill would amend section 10-76ff of the general statutes, which governs special education evaluations in the state. The proposed changes are expected to hasten the identification and provision of appropriate educational resources for children needing special education. By streamlining the evaluation process, the bill seeks to minimize the time children spend waiting for assessments and determinations that can significantly impact their learning and development. This change could lead to a more efficient system that better serves the needs of students and families who rely on special education services.

Summary

House Bill 05683 aims to address delays in the evaluation and determination process for children who are suspected of requiring special education services. The bill mandates that local or regional boards of education must complete all evaluations and make a determination of eligibility promptly. It specifically prohibits delays in this process while a child undergoes interventions under the Connecticut response to intervention program. The intent is to ensure timely support and services for children with potential disabilities, thereby enhancing their educational opportunities and outcomes.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its focus on improving educational services for children with disabilities, there may be points of contention regarding the practical implementation of faster evaluations. Educators and school administrators might voice concerns about the additional pressures this places on already strained resources. Opponents may argue that while the intent is beneficial, there is a risk that rushing the evaluation process could result in inadequate assessments, leading to inappropriate categorizations of children's needs. Balancing the need for timely evaluations with the necessity for thorough, accurate assessments could be a key area for debate as the bill progresses.