Connecticut House Bill HB06141

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/11
• Refer: 1/25/11

Caption

An Act Increasing The Penalties For Irresponsible Driving.

Impact

This bill represents a significant tightening of existing laws on traffic violations and aims to reinforce public safety measures on the road. The new financial penalties could act as a deterrent for potential offenders, thereby reducing the incidence of irresponsible driving behaviors. By establishing a structured assessment that spans three years, HB 6141 intends not only to punish but also to change driving habits over the long term. The revenue generated from these assessments could potentially be allocated to public safety programs, though specific allocations have not been detailed in the bill text.

Summary

House Bill 6141, introduced by Representative Smith, aims to increase penalties for irresponsible driving offenses. The key provision of the bill stipulates that motorists who accumulate six or more points on their driving record within an eighteen-month period, or those convicted of drug or alcohol-related driving offenses, will incur a driver responsibility assessment. This assessment is in addition to any existing fines or penalties, creating a more stringent framework for addressing reckless driving behaviors. The penalty structure includes a fee of one hundred dollars per year for the first six points, thirty-five dollars for each additional point over six, and two hundred fifty dollars for each offense related to drugs or alcohol, or refusal of a chemical test.

Contention

The proposal may face opposition from various stakeholders including civil rights groups and certain advocacy organizations who argue that increased financial penalties disproportionately affect lower-income drivers. Critics point out that the additional costs may not necessarily improve road safety and could lead to financial burdens for individuals struggling with existing traffic fines or penalties. Additionally, the bill does not address head-on alternative methods for supporting individuals with substance use issues, warranting a debate on whether punitive measures are the most effective approach to ensuring road safety.