Connecticut House Bill HB06379

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Report Pass: 3/10/11
• Report Pass: 4/25/11
• Refer: 4/29/11
• Report Pass: 5/5/11

Caption

An Act Delaying The Establishment Of The Department On Aging.

Impact

This legislation directly impacts how services for the elderly are administered in the state. By delaying the establishment of the Department on Aging, the bill means that oversight and management of elderly-related programs will continue under the existing Department of Social Services for an extended period. This could affect the quality and direction of services available to elderly citizens, as the new department was intended to focus specifically on their needs.

Summary

House Bill 6379 aims to delay the establishment of a dedicated Department on Aging in Connecticut, shifting the responsibility for elderly care and services temporarily under the Department of Social Services. The delay of this department, initially set to be established by July 1, 2011, would push its initiation to July 1, 2013. Proponents of the bill argue that this postponement allows for proper planning and organization of resources to better serve the elderly population.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6379 appears to be mixed. Supporters believe that delaying the new department's establishment could ensure more comprehensive planning, while opponents raise concerns over the continued governance of elderly services under a more generalized department that may not adequately prioritize the elderly's unique needs. The discussion emphasizes the balance needed between immediate actions and strategic long-term planning in social services for the state's aging population.

Contention

There is noticeable contention regarding whether delaying the formation of the Department on Aging is beneficial or detrimental. Critics argue that this delay may hinder progress made in the realm of elderly care, while supporters contend it allows for thorough preparation to ensure the new department can effectively serve its purpose once established. This reflects a larger debate over the most effective ways to manage aging services and the prioritization of funding and resources.