Connecticut House Bill HB06387

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Report Pass: 4/21/11
• Refer: 5/5/11
• Report Pass: 5/11/11

Caption

An Act Concerning Vessel Registration Fees.

Impact

The changes brought by HB 06387 are significant, as they replace a previously less structured fee system with a clearer, tier-based approach. The bill not only aims to enhance revenue collection for the state but also seeks to ensure that fees are proportional to the size and type of vessel. By doing so, it may encourage more boat owners to register their vessels properly and contribute to state funds, especially with an increase in fees for larger vessels that may have traditionally been under-registered.

Summary

House Bill 06387 introduces amendments to the regulations surrounding vessel registration fees in the state. The bill proposes a new fee schedule based on the overall length of vessels, with fees ranging from $7.50 for vessels less than 12 feet to $525 for vessels measuring 65 feet and over. This structured approach aims to create a fair and standardized fee system that considers the size of the vessels and their intended use, thereby impacting how boat owners choose to register their vessels in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 06387 appears to be supportive among legislators who understand the need for clear regulations and equitable fees. However, there may be contention among some boat owners who might see these fee increases as burdensome. The bill also offers specific exemptions for certain groups such as the Coast Guard Auxiliary, which helps mitigate some concerns among volunteer vessel owners. Overall, the response seems to lean towards appreciation for improved structure in registration processes.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the overall impact of fee increases, particularly for small vessel owners who operate for recreational purposes. Some may argue that the fee levels could discourage boat ownership, especially for lower-income families. Additionally, the fee exemptions for educational institutions and specific nonprofit organizations may spark debate regarding what qualifies as a valid need for exemption and whether such exceptions should be expanded or limited.