Connecticut House Bill HB06589

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Refer: 3/10/11

Caption

An Act Increasing The Penalties For Drunken Driving When A Child Is A Passenger Or When Serious Injury Or Death Of A Child Results.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will amend existing statutes related to vehicular crimes, specifically those concerning driving under the influence (DUI). It will particularly elevate the repercussions for DUI offenses involving minors, classifying them under more severe felony categories. Moreover, the bill will introduce mandatory use of ignition interlock devices for offenders, ensuring that even after their license is restored, individuals cannot operate vehicles without this safety measure for a defined period.

Summary

House Bill 06589 aims to significantly increase the legal penalties for individuals convicted of drunken driving when a child is a passenger in the vehicle. Specifically, it proposes harsher fines and longer imprisonment terms, particularly for those whose actions lead to serious injury or death of a child under the age of sixteen. The bill seeks not only to impose stricter consequences to deter future offenses but also to emphasize the heightened responsibility drivers have when children are present.

Conclusion

Overall, HB06589 represents a legislative effort to enhance child safety on the roads by holding drivers to a higher standard when minors are in their vehicles. The bill reflects a growing societal awareness of the dangers posed by drinking and driving, particularly when children are endangered, signaling a potential shift towards more preventive measures in traffic legislation.

Contention

There may be concerns surrounding the enforcement of these stringent penalties, with some stakeholders arguing that such penalties could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who might struggle with the financial implications of increased fines and mandatory device installations. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the implications for rehabilitation versus punishment, with advocates for reform suggesting that a focus solely on penalties might overlook the root causes of substance abuse and impaired driving.